What does the Republican Party stand for?

Which nation in the list is not a Marxist dictatorship?

I already answered that question.

You answered incorrectly, all three were/are Marxist dictatorships.

I answered correctly.

You are just too dumb to research the things you post about, which makes you look very stupid.

You are telling me that

The National Socialist German Workers Party was not socialist.

You also said that Benito Mussolini, a former socialist journalist at the Avanti! newspaper was not a socialist

Then you said that North Korea who's article 1 of their constitution states the DPRK is an "independent socialist State" is not a socialist nation.

Then you have the gall to call me stupid. You need to lay off the crack pipe homie.

Whatever they are acting like, it’s their prerogative isn’t it? They are a private company and can have put on their platform what they want, right? Are you saying government should tell private entities what they can or cannot publish or have published on their platforms? That is, by definition, censorship.

Would love to have any of this backed with evidence. And don’t give me examples of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, etc. Marx was dead before any of them even read his works.

Correct. I said Nazi Germany under Hitler: Not socialist. Not communist. And I have provided facts to support this.

You referred to the Italian Social Republic which was a Nazi Germany puppet government: Not socialist. Not communist. This "republic" was formed late in the war and was nothing but a puppet government. At that point Mussolini was no longer in control. Do your research

Democratic Republic of the People of Korea: Is not a Democracy even though that word is in its title. It is also not a socialist state. It is a dictatorship.

And yes, I have the gall to call you stupid... in fact, a f***ing moron.

You need to crack a few history books... and a dictionary or two.

Again, only partially correct.

In fact, socialism is a political, social and economic.

Socialism definitions

1. Wikiepedia > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

“Socialism is a political, social and economic philosophy encompassing a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership[1][2][3] of the means of production[4][5][6][7] and workers' self-management of enterprises.[8][9] It includes the political theories and movements associated with such systems.[10] Social ownership can be public, collective, cooperative, or of equity.[11] While no single definition encapsulates many types of socialism,[12] social ownership is the one common element.[1][13][14]”

2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy > https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socialism/

“Socialism is a rich tradition of political thought and practice, the history of which contains a vast number of views and theories, often differing in many of their conceptual, empirical, and normative commitments…”

3. Investopedia > https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialism.asp

“Socialism is a populist economic and political system....”

4. Cambridge Dictionary > https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/socialism

“...the set of beliefs that states that all people are equal and should shareequally in a country's money, or the political system based on these beliefs…”

5. etc... etc... etc...

You may not agree, but your disagreement is going against facts and definitions. Not my opinion... just facts and definitions.

It's all BS. The bigger picture is that the One World Government think tanks got sold on the idea of Socialism. It seemed simpler to them to take Communist nations and Capitalist nations and form a Universal government based on socialism because it sits somewhere in the middle of the two.

Marx was simply trying to figure out a way to address the grievances of common people but keep an oligarchy. His answers were,
TO get rid of racism have children raised by the state
kill off all dissenters ahead of time
to get rid of religious intolerance ban religion and replace it with psychology
Marx was a vehement anti semite so of course kill the Jews
To get rid of ethnocentric behavior, ban ethnic identity
ban weapons and control information and speech through the government
Ban private ownership so people could never raise their own wealth base (this is because the American revolution was funded by wealthy colonists)

The whole socialism thing, packaged for the stupid people, has been an ongoing effort at selling it to the American public. It's been spun and respun, defined as this that and the other thing, It's propaganda. Dismiss it and move on. Socialist nations in the world are able to exploit people and control information very efficiently.

Dude, we get it. You hate socialism. Fine. Some people hate Buddhism. - tell them to meditate and they - lose their s***- Fine.

You are still fundamentally incorrect on the socio-political, economic ideology that is socialism. Its a bigger philosophy than the box you are trying to put it in by just calling it economics.

You can still hate it or think its stupid, you're still factually incorrect the same way I would be in arguing with someone about Buddhism.

(I don't hate Buddhism, I simply don't understand it and comparison wise, socialism Buddhism not that far different in their complications of where is philosophy and putting things into practice.)

But yeah just because Nazi's had socialist in the party name doesn't mean they were socialists, the same way a lot of countries have democracy and repubplic in the name but are neither.

On the topic though, I can't see where the GOP is going to go from this.

Not that I'm saying the DNC is perfect, it's got to make changes, I just have a general idea what direction those will go in.

Like I don't even know who are the real leaders of the party anymore, or the upcoming leaders pushing the directions.

The goal here is to promote fair and open competition and to keep an open platform of online media outlets

The Becerra lawsuit is a great first step.

Too Big To Fail? No. Try: "So Big It Has To Fail!" Stop zero platforming unpopular speech.

What happened is the GOP put Trump in charge to run on an anti-neo con ticket. Problem is, the same cult telling Bush Jr what to do was telling him what to do too. The idea was to have him look like enough of a buffoon the GOP would fall back in step with the Neo Cons. He danced fairly well all things considered, kept us out of a war with Iran for now. But, the other crap, the racism, anti environmental stance, the budget fared about the same. Hopefully those on the right will realize there are more than just two factions in their party.

And I for one, really like buddhism

The goal with this lawsuit is not of censorship or the eradication of censorship. It is of breaking up a monopoly, and doesn’t really have anything to do with telling the entity (or if broken up, the entities) what they can or cannot publish. That will remain the same. Facebook is simply too big, and the government wants them to sell Instagram and WhatsApp, and perhaps allow third parties to cross publish from there.