@Leon Said
Why? Just out of curiousity.
1st time was a sort of feeling of duty as a christian, which I was at the time. I don't think I got much out of it that 1st time.
2nd time was part of studying it, and also a sense of duty as a christian. In part it was to try to really understand it, as the 1st time kind of
went over my head. I was seeking guidance from god.
At the end of this reading, some doubt had begun to form... the biggest question was
is this really supposed to be factual or is this metaphorical?
After this time I had begun to look into/study the compilation of the bible... the who/what/when/where/why of its writing and compilation.
3rd time was... I suppose one could say that my "faith" had been shaken and I was seeking an
answer... or seeking
the answer... By the time I had finished it that time, whatever faith I had in the god of Abraham was long gone.
The question
is this really supposed to be factual or is this metaphor? had seemingly been answered; metaphor.
But then came another big question
if this is metaphor why is there so little "good" in it? Perhaps it is just mythology, and as with all mythology the ancient meanings are mostly irrelevant.
4th time was in part to study it as a comparative theological thing. That is, more or less comparing/contrasting it to other mythologies (Gilgamesh in particular), creation stories, and religions/philosophies (Buddhism and Shinto in particular).
Side note: I honestly don't expect anyone to read the bible as I did. I don't even expect most christians to make it through once, after all it is a very hard read. The prose are terrible.
None the less, it gets my proverbial goat that some many christians like to tell people what the bible says, when the have never even tried to read it. They seem to present themselves as "knowing" what it says (or even as "experts" as to what it says), but have not read it. It blows my mind.