Post in Forums
Create a Profile
Upload Pictures
Keep a Journal
Meet Friends
It's FREE!
Sign Up!
Forum Index > News & Politics > Animal Rights
>> these poor animals need our help!
Reply to Topic
Search Topic
Subscription
Author Message
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...9 10 11 · >>
New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 23:09:50#46
rogy

Meister
1091 points


Send PM


51/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2007

adrinachrome said:
Intelligent people have been exploiting less intelligent people for as long as people have been around as well. Thats different though, people with a lower capacity to think are still people they can still fell the deeper emotions that only humans can feel they can still to some extent rationalize what is going on around them. Face it dude we're a very cruel species and that is not going to change.


First, there is a great deal of ignorance about the emotional lives of nonhuman animals: link [www.animalperson.net]

Darwin suggested that nonhuman lives were emotionally complex.

As for just getting used the the cruelty of human animals, that, obviously, is something animal rights sets out to alter.

Admittedly this would require a cultural revolution.

rogy
rogy last visited October 10, 2008
New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 23:13:03#47
adrinachrome

Ogler
20853 points


Send PM


25/M/, United States (general)
Join Date: Apr 2008

All this talk about cows... I'm hungry I'll be back.


clever got me this far then tricky got me in



"trust no bitch"

adrinachrome last visited October 11, 2008
New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 23:20:44#48
rogy

Meister
1091 points


Send PM


51/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2007

alexkidd said:
ok biology lesson,
cows can continue to produce milk for years, they don't produce a fixed supply measured per calf.

most calves are farmed and grow up to either be milk producers themselves or are raised and later killed as adults for food.
some are killed as calfs, its quite a delicacy.

whatever your view on the need to kill animals, which can be very much backed up, i'd rather see meat producing farms growing crops.
i eat a small amount of meat these days, but i've been a vegetarian i have strong opinions on the ethical treatment of animals.

but we are not stealing milk from the calves.



Ah - see what you are saying now. Because we have exploited cows so that they produce far more milk than is natural for such a mammal, then we are not technically taking a calf's share. Of course, we take their share too if we decide to use the calves for veal.

"MAKING MILK - HOW DOES A DAIRY COW DO IT?

Most mammals only produce enough milk to feed their young. Dairy cows are different, they produce far more milk than their young calves can use. A calf only needs a small portion of her mother's milk supply during the first few months of life (about 255 litres). Since a good dairy cow produces more than 6,100 litres of milk in a year, there is a lot of extra milk for us to use. A cow produces milk for about ten months following the birth of her calf and for the process to continue she must have a calf every year."

From an industry source, rather than an AR one: link [www.milk.mb.ca]

rogy
rogy last visited October 10, 2008
Edited: May 08, 2008 @ 23:22
New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 23:54:17#49
rogy

Meister
1091 points


Send PM


51/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2007

jonnythan said:
Baby cows are not children.

I assume you're pro-life?


In general terms, I am prolife. However, in terms of the abortion debate, we have to recognise that we are often discussing a unique ethical situation in which one right holder, or potential right holder, is inside the body of another right holder.

This makes for a complex moral issue.

rogy
rogy last visited October 10, 2008
Edited: May 08, 2008 @ 23:55
New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 23:59:00#50
rogy

Meister
1091 points


Send PM


51/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2007

adrinachrome said:
There probably wouldn't be even a quarter as much cows on Earth today if it wasn't for us breeding them, so in a sense they owe us their lives.



You want support for a system of slavery because slaves are thereby born into servitude?

Of course, you will realise that animal rights theory would reduce and end the domestication and holding of nonhuman captives.

rogy
rogy last visited October 10, 2008
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:00:55#51
adrinachrome

Ogler
20853 points


Send PM


25/M/, United States (general)
Join Date: Apr 2008

rogy said:
You want support for a system of slavery because slaves are thereby born into servitude?

Of course, you will realise that animal rights theory would reduce and end the domestication and holding of nonhuman captives.

rogy


Slavery they're animals for s**ts sake! I just had me a triple stacker whopper and am ready to defend my right to eat cows.


clever got me this far then tricky got me in



"trust no bitch"
adrinachrome last visited October 11, 2008
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:01:01#52
rogy

Meister
1091 points


Send PM


51/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2007

alexkidd said:
if fur is wrong then so is leather.


This issue is addressed in this newly-published animal rights blog entry: link [www.abolitionistapproach.com]

rogy
rogy last visited October 10, 2008
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:01:05#53
jonnythan

Twinky
97159 points


Send PM


27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

rogy said:
You want support for a system of slavery because slaves are thereby born into servitude?

Of course, you will realise that animal rights theory would reduce and end the domestication and holding of nonhuman captives.

rogy


Slaves are human.

Cows are not slaves.

You have thus far called cows "children" and "slaves." Please stop. It's quite disingenuous to keep anthropomorphizing animals.


"Our ideas held no water, but we used them like a dam."
jonnythan is online! (Last active within 6 minutes)
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:02:38#54
adrinachrome

Ogler
20853 points


Send PM


25/M/, United States (general)
Join Date: Apr 2008

jonnythan said:
It's quite disingenuous to keep anthropomorphizing animals.



Now I have to go look some words up.

I guess I didn't really have to, they pretty much mean exactly what you'd think they meant, given the context they were used in.


clever got me this far then tricky got me in



"trust no bitch"
adrinachrome last visited October 11, 2008
Edited: May 09, 2008 @ 00:04
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:03:58#55
rogy

Meister
1091 points


Send PM


51/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2007

adrinachrome said:
Slavery they're animals for s**ts sake! I just had me a triple stacker whopper and am ready to defend my right to eat cows.



We, too, are animals. As we have seen from this discussion, we are mammals. We are apes - this is not a problem just a fact.

I think when you say right to eat a cow, you mean the power to do so.

Obviously, animal rights theory is critical of current power relations.

rogy
rogy last visited October 10, 2008
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:06:36#56
psy

General
365 points

Deleted

Send PM


99/F/, United Kingdom
Join Date: May 2008

adrinachrome said:
Now I have to go look some words up.

I guess I didn't really have to, they pretty much mean exactly what you'd think they meant, given the context they were used in.


to attribute human form or personality to things not human believe it or not that is what that big word means
psy last visited May 15, 2008
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:06:43#57
rogy

Meister
1091 points


Send PM


51/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2007

jonnythan said:
Slaves are human.

Cows are not slaves.

You have thus far called cows "children" and "slaves." Please stop. It's quite disingenuous to keep anthropomorphizing animals.



I am at a loss as to why we cannot regard nonhuman as well as human animals slaves if their labour power is exploited.

Cow's milk is clear baby food - that is why humans often "skim it" to reduce the amount of fat meant for a cow's offspring.

rogy
rogy last visited October 10, 2008
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:07:33#58
adrinachrome

Ogler
20853 points


Send PM


25/M/, United States (general)
Join Date: Apr 2008

rogy said:
We, too, are animals. As we have seen from this discussion, we are mammals. We are apes - this is not a problem just a fact.

I think when you say right to eat a cow, you mean the power to do so.

Obviously, animal rights theory is critical of current power relations.

rogy


Its my right to eat them, my species bred them for that purpose specifically. You should join me, ribs are good, steak is good!


clever got me this far then tricky got me in



"trust no bitch"
adrinachrome last visited October 11, 2008
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:07:53#59
rogy

Meister
1091 points


Send PM


51/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2007

psy said:
to attribute human form or personality to things not human believe it or not that is what that big word means


But I have never suggested that nonhuman animals have human animal form or personality.

rogy
rogy last visited October 10, 2008
New Post! May 09, 2008 @ 00:08:17#60
jonnythan

Twinky
97159 points


Send PM


27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

rogy said:
I am at a loss as to why we cannot regard nonhuman as well as human animals slaves if their labour power is exploited.

Cow's milk is clear baby food - that is why humans often "skim it" to reduce the amount of fat meant for a cow's offspring.

rogy


Because animals are, by definition, not slaves.

Nor are baby animals children.


"Our ideas held no water, but we used them like a dam."
jonnythan is online! (Last active within 6 minutes)
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...9 10 11 · >>

Top

TFS Time: Sat 11 Oct 2008 01:11 pm CDT
Copyright © 2004-2008 Funky Llama Productions, LLC   |   Home   |   Contact   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of service
Proudly hosted by Liquid Web

 
The Forum Site - Your premier source for everything