Forum Index > News & Politics > Animal Rights
>> fewer chemicals = less animal torture
Reply to Topic
Search Topic
Subscription
Author Message

New Post! Apr 02, 2008 @ 16:13:43#1
amish

Debater
5037 points


Send PM


31/M/,
Join Date: Feb 2008

this is a slightly different thread with a slightly different intention than the other one, i'm not suggesting a full boycott that a small percentage of people would participate, i'm suggesting the use of common sense in a way that almost everyone could participate in.

we are slaves to corporate chemical manufacturers. they know it, and you should know it. so this isn't about not being slaves anymore, that's too ambitious. this is about reason.

everytime we use these chemicals, bad s**t happens. it goes into the water, the soil, the air. the process of manufacturing it puts stuff in the water, the soil, and air. the packaging goes into the soil, and then the water. and the chemicals go in our lungs and sit around the house, affecting us and our pets.

and of course, the animal torture. now i know most people (obviously) think, so what, it's necessary. whatever, if you insist it is, i'm not going to try to convince you when your mind is made up.

i won't point out that you can just look for labels that say "no animal testing," because you probably go to a store where most products don't have them, and you can't be bothered, and the stuff is more expensive and you don't like it as much. fine.

but you know, you are probably using more chemicals than you need. i'm not saying don't clean your toilet and counters (although i wouldn't try doing both at the same time) or don't mop the floors, i'm saying, you probably use more chemicals than you need. and more chemicals = more animal torture.

so what you can do about this is simple. don't go out of your way to cut down on using them. don't go crazy, don't become a granola-munching hippie because it just isn't done anymore. all i'm saying is look around. you may find there's a simple way to use a smaller amount of harsh chemical s**t in your home.

me, i'm already thinking more about it because of the animal testing. this week i found an old can of febreze air effects, which is a lot nicer than that glade freshener crap people choke themselves with. so i was happy to find it because you know? it really does wonders for the (aromas) atmosphere around the place. i was thinking of buying a new can of it to try out another scent.

but since it's made by one of these nasty corporations that torture animals, i'm thinking, "you know what? i really don't need it at all." i know some people might, maybe you breed animals, or have a pet ferret, but i don't. so i'm never buying it again. i don't need it it's that simple.

less profit for animal torturers, equals less torture. anything you can do would add up if it was as simple as everyone doing one little thing. you know the american products from lay's are getting healthier and healthier as people think more about things like msg and bht, the latter is banned in the uk anyway.

they're still using gmo's i'm sure, but the idea of eating organic is a lot more popular than it used to be, and it proves that even a percentage increase in awareness affects the coporate reality. the real power is how money is spent, always take the opportunity to vote your will with your dollars (or pounds or euros, etc.) politicians won't change anything against the will of buyers.


mary matalin <-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|- 0 -|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-> marlee matlin

amish last visited May 08, 2008
0 Kudos   

New Post! Apr 02, 2008 @ 16:15:30#2
jonnythan

Bogey Man
78698 points


Send PM


26/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

Um....


Which chemicals?


"TUFF! EVOLVE FASTER NEXT TIME AND YOU WILL BE THE ONE WITH THE SPEAR!" -doubtingthomas

jonnythan is online! (Last active within 1 minutes)
0 Kudos   

New Post! Apr 02, 2008 @ 16:35:22#3
amish

Debater
5037 points


Send PM


31/M/,
Join Date: Feb 2008

oh that's simple.

all of the ones that don't say "no animal testing."

i'm not suggesting people switch to the ones that use no animal testing, if people were going to bother with that they would have already.

i'm suggesting an alternative, realizing there are some chemicals you just don't need at all, or don't need to use as much of.

switching to cruelty-free chemicals is more expensive than what people are doing now (and noble.) since most people aren't noble, i'm trying to appeal to practicality. use less of all kinds of chemicals, which is less expensive than what people are doing now. it's like having an extra $10 or £10 a week because you cut back on smoking.


mary matalin <-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|- 0 -|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-> marlee matlin

amish last visited May 08, 2008
0 Kudos   

New Post! Apr 02, 2008 @ 16:38:41#4
jonnythan

Bogey Man
78698 points


Send PM


26/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

No one goes to the store and buys individual chemicals. They buy formulations from companies. Some do animal testing but most don't.

I'm unsure what you're asking or proposing here. Are you saying that people should use more cosmetics from companies that don't do animal testing? Is this about the environment, animal testing, personal health, or what?


"TUFF! EVOLVE FASTER NEXT TIME AND YOU WILL BE THE ONE WITH THE SPEAR!" -doubtingthomas

jonnythan is online! (Last active within 1 minutes)
0 Kudos   Edited: April 02, 2008 @ 16:39

New Post! Apr 02, 2008 @ 16:40:13#5
treebee
point whore spanker
Über-Moderator
147485 points


Send PM


38/F/Escaped!!!, United Kingdom
Join Date: Oct 2005

link [www.chickenout.tv] this was a HUGE HUGE campaign in the UK earlier in the year. One TV channel was dedicated to promoting healthier and cruelty free produce for a whole week.

Many people took part, i myself am a member of chicken out.

The mainstream supermarkets put up much resistance, making organic meat practically impossible to get hold of. Putting the price of battery produce down to ridiculous money so that people soon forgot the campaign and went back to buying intensively farmed meat.

Even the people involved in the campaign have actually been banned from certain stores.

On the good side, one mainstream supermarket in the UK is going over to complete free range stock, Hellmans mayyonaise is going to be producing only free range stock, the EU are changing the laws on battery hens to make the surroundings more humane.

I don't think its pointless to educate people about what products they are using. I think there are few working cla** families that can actually afford to adopt moral purchasing and it is made so difficult by massive companies such as Walmart (Asda's) and Tesco in the UK to make a moral purchase.

I also feel that many people choose not to think about it.

But Hey! progress is being made and people are much more aware about what is in the stuff we buy.


link [www.thebreastcancersite.com] Please click to save a life
Teresa is a doll that should be purchased for regular playtime - Googlism

treebee last visited May 13, 2008
0 Kudos   

New Post! Apr 02, 2008 @ 17:16:40#6
amish

Debater
5037 points


Send PM


31/M/,
Join Date: Feb 2008

Quote:
No one goes to the store and buys individual chemicals. They buy formulations from companies.


i didn't think i would confuse anyone by referring to "formulations" as "chemicals." i'm referring to an entire cleaner (say, pinesol) as "a chemical." i think i would confuse more people with the word "formulations." but it's not a word i normally use anyway.

and i'm not saying "BOYCOTT PINESOL!" i'm saying that unlike many people, you might not need pinesol. or you might use it more often (in some cases, far more often) than you need to. it's an example, i'm sure different people overuse things differently, and there's no size fits all just figure out what you overuse.

the whole idea is based on the premise that people are using much more than they need, i believe this firmly. people juts have a habit of using products. some use is necessary. for instance, i was going to start using more febreze, and decided i would be fine using none, since they torture animals.

Quote:
Some do animal testing but most don't.


you might be right, but i suspect you are misinformed. any company that does not use animal testing would be very foolish not to advertise the fact.

Quote:
I'm unsure what you're asking or proposing here. Are you saying that people should use more cosmetics from companies that don't do animal testing?


you're just not reading what i'm saying. i understand the first post was long, but in my reply tailored to your own questions before, i said:

Quote:
i'm not suggesting people switch to the ones that use no animal testing, if people were going to bother with that they would have already.

i'm suggesting an alternative, realizing there are some chemicals you just don't need at all, or don't need to use as much of.


it was a short reply and each of those points were on their own line. i simply cannot write more clearly than that.

Quote:
Is this about the environment, animal testing, personal health, or what?


it's about all of those. basically i'm saying "you're probably overusing chemicals already, if everyone found one tiny way to cut back or even stop overusing one cleaner or fragrance or other formulation, there would be less animal torture in the world." really it could be one, or two or more. i thought it was worth mentioning at the time.


mary matalin <-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|- 0 -|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-> marlee matlin

amish last visited May 08, 2008
0 Kudos   Edited: April 02, 2008 @ 17:18

New Post! Apr 03, 2008 @ 15:44:12#7
buffalobill90

Über Master Debater
8659 points


Send PM


18/M/Whitehaven, United Kingdom
Join Date: Jun 2007

I remember reading in the feedback section of New Scientist about a skincare product which claimed to be 'chemical free'.

buffalobill90 last visited May 09, 2008
0 Kudos   

New Post! Apr 03, 2008 @ 15:46:45#8
jonnythan

Bogey Man
78698 points


Send PM


26/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005




"TUFF! EVOLVE FASTER NEXT TIME AND YOU WILL BE THE ONE WITH THE SPEAR!" -doubtingthomas

jonnythan is online! (Last active within 1 minutes)
0 Kudos   

New Post! Apr 03, 2008 @ 16:40:02#9
amish

Debater
5037 points


Send PM


31/M/,
Join Date: Feb 2008

Quote:
But Hey! progress is being made and people are much more aware about what is in the stuff we buy.


outside of the thread that is. i wasn't expecting you to be the one with the serious reply treebee, but thanks. i also think it's funny that when we were debating before you didn't mention you were a member of something like this. you got me there, eh? cheers.


mary matalin <-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|- 0 -|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-> marlee matlin

amish last visited May 08, 2008
0 Kudos   
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

Top

TFS Time: Tue 13 May 2008 08:02 pm CDT
Copyright © 2004-2008 Funky Llama Productions, LLC   |   Home   |   Contact   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of service
Proudly hosted by Liquid Web

 
The Forum Site - Your premier source for everything