did man land on the moon ??????????????????????? forums

Forum Index > News & Politics > Conspiracies

>> did man land on the moon ???????????????????????

Search Topic

Subscription

Author

Message

Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 · >>

Mar 10, 2008 @ 01:17:56

#76

jonnythan

Abominable Snowman
89378 points

27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

the7thdimension said:
there are a few problems with the video of the moon landing.

one, the video pictures the american flag waving. theres no wind in space.

there are no stars in the pictures. why not?

there shouldnt have been a huge blast crater in the vacuum of space.

astronaut footage was shot in slow motion

there are many others, but these are the forerunners

The flag is not waving in the wind.

There are no stars for the same reason there are no stars in daylight pictures on earth.

There would not have been a blast crater because there was no blast.

Footage was not shot in slow motion.

My Flickr

Apr 21, 2008 @ 10:34:47

#77

14yearoldgenius

Über-General
459 points

14/NA/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Feb 2008

personally i dont believe that people landed on the moon, i mean if the
radiation was so bad how come all the astraunauts wernt coverd in mutations
and bubbles wen they came back to earth? also have you looked at the
picture taken on the moon? the flags blowing. tht means wind. which means
atmosphere, which means it wasnt the moon. also look at the shadows. the
shadows on the moon would make all the visable side of the moon as day yet,
only half of it is. Last but not least if Neil Armstrong was the first man on the
moon, who filmed him climbing out the ship?

there is no such thing as innocence, only varying degrees of guilt.

14yearoldgenius last visited July 14, 2008

Apr 21, 2008 @ 10:44:43

#78

aceuvclubs

Über-Minister
17873 points

29/M/Sault Ste Marie, Michigan
Join Date: Nov 2007

So did they have photoshop in the 60's, because this photo taken in 1968 looks pretty genuine?

link [en.wikipedia.org]
(sorry, you have to actually click on the picture link)

What the Deuce?

Smoochie Boochie

Edited: April 21, 2008 @ 10:45

Apr 21, 2008 @ 10:53:54

#79

14yearoldgenius

Über-General
459 points

14/NA/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Feb 2008

i no ive already posted on this but i thought of another reason why it was a
hoax. there are no stars. now people say that you crnt see stars during the
day on earth but this i because the atmosphere displaces the suns light,
turning the sky blue and covering up the stars. on the moon their is no
atmosphere so there shouldnt be that problem.

there is no such thing as innocence, only varying degrees of guilt.

Apr 21, 2008 @ 10:54:27

#80

treebee
UM - BONGO
Über-Moderator
156209 points

38/F/Escaped!!!, United Kingdom
Join Date: Oct 2005

does anyone read any of the previous posts?

link [www.thebreastcancersite.com] Please click to save a life
Teresa is a doll that should be purchased for regular playtime - Googlism

Apr 21, 2008 @ 13:09:27

#81

jonnythan

Abominable Snowman
89378 points

27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

14yearoldgenius said:
i no ive already posted on this but i thought of another reason why it was a
hoax. there are no stars. now people say that you crnt see stars during the
day on earth but this i because the atmosphere displaces the suns light,
turning the sky blue and covering up the stars. on the moon their is no
atmosphere so there shouldnt be that problem.

Let's do a little experiment.

Go out in your back yard with a camera on a clear night where you can see lots and lots of stars.

Now have your friend stand in the light and take a picture of him with the flash turned off. Make sure you have a lot of the starry sky in the background.

When you look at the picture on your computer, you may be surprised to see that there are no stars in the image. The stars are simply too faint to appear in the picture.

My Flickr

Apr 21, 2008 @ 13:20:28

#82

jonnythan

Abominable Snowman
89378 points

27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

14yearoldgenius said:
personally i dont believe that people landed on the moon, i mean if the
radiation was so bad how come all the astraunauts wernt coverd in mutations
and bubbles wen they came back to earth? also have you looked at the
picture taken on the moon? the flags blowing. tht means wind. which means
atmosphere, which means it wasnt the moon. also look at the shadows. the
shadows on the moon would make all the visable side of the moon as day yet,
only half of it is. Last but not least if Neil Armstrong was the first man on the
moon, who filmed him climbing out the ship?

1) NASA took measures against the radiation in the Van Allen belts. Besides, they only spent a very small amount of time passing through. The astronauts actually wore dosimeters (radiation level meters) to monitor the radiation levels they were exposed to.

2) The flag is not "blowing." Watch this video. The flag is clearly not waving or blowing in the wind. Once they stop touching it, it sits completely motionless:

3) I have no idea what you're talking about here. Make all the visibile side of the moon as day? What?

4) Obviously NASA wanted a video of the first man in history setting foot on the moon. So they positioned a camera on the lunar lander itself and pointed it at the lunar lander door. If you look at the video of Neil getting down from the lander, it's easy to tell.

My Flickr

May 18, 2008 @ 21:52:51

#83

mischakittykat

General
291 points

33/F/amherst, Massachusetts
Join Date: Apr 2008

I believe we did land, though the radiation theroy is interesting.

mischakittykat last visited August 13, 2008

May 18, 2008 @ 21:57:40

#84

alexkidd

Monk
38015 points

23/M/in a bog, Ireland
Join Date: Sep 2006

here's an interesting page about the conspiracy,

link [iangoddard.net]

May 19, 2008 @ 10:34:17

#85

harrie85

Über-Meister
2262 points

23/F/Bury St Edmunds, United Kingdo
Join Date: Mar 2008

Its definately suspicious!?!?!?! the strings and the moving flag with no gravity... who knows but man definately has since so its all good lol.

Smile like you mean it !

link [www.ezylet.co.uk] the property rental network.

May 19, 2008 @ 11:35:09

#86

jonnythan

Abominable Snowman
89378 points

27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

harrie85 said:
Its definately suspicious!?!?!?!

the strings and the moving flag with no gravity... who knows but man definately has since so its all good lol.

It's not suspicious. I dunno what you mean by strings, and the flag doesn't move with no gravity.

In fact, if you look at the video I posted above, you can see that the flag does something that would be literally impossible if there were an atmosphere: it stands perfectly still after they stop touching it.

My Flickr

May 24, 2008 @ 05:31:34

#87

digger8

Über-Commander
171 points

43/M/AUCKLAND, New Zealand
Join Date: May 2008

Yes the radiation thing is the complete story...THE MOON LANDINGS ARE A HOAX .We are talking about Xrays,Gamma rays,...(millions of electron volts)and these can only be stopped by lead or 1M of water.During the so called landings the Sun had a number of major events as well.So standing on the moon in the sun would be alote worse than sunburn standing on the beach on Earth (After passing through all our atmosphere).

May 24, 2008 @ 13:45:08

#88

jonnythan

Abominable Snowman
89378 points

27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

digger8 said:
Yes the radiation thing is the complete story...THE MOON LANDINGS ARE A HOAX .We are talking about Xrays,Gamma rays,...(millions of electron volts)and these can only be stopped by lead or 1M of water.During the so called landings the Sun had a number of major events as well.So standing on the moon in the sun would be alote worse than sunburn standing on the beach on Earth (After passing through all our atmosphere).

You don't really know anything about radiation.

By the way, if you haven't noticed, no one stood on the moon with bare skin exposed.

My Flickr

Jun 02, 2008 @ 13:39:07

#89

law

Apprentice
22 points

39/F/newbury, United Kingdom
Join Date: Jun 2008

My Gran watched the moon landings. She always said they never went to the moon. I have seen the footage now myself and have been to kennedy space centre and seen the lunar lander. No way did they go to the moon. President Kennedy said in 1962 we would be on the moon within 10 years, so they had to hoax it to beat the russians....

Jun 02, 2008 @ 13:59:04

#90

jonnythan

Abominable Snowman
89378 points

27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

Do you have any reason to say we've never been there?

I wonder what people will say when they're watching live video of Artemis V (or whatever) landing on the moon in 2018 and see - live on TV - the American flag coming into sight.

My Flickr

<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 · >>

Top