link [snopes.com]

It isn't quite as sensational as Wash thinks but at the same time, there is indeed a controversy here. Namely, a question of if this does indeed cross the line. The truth is, you do indeed need to know about the religion of a certain region. For example, it's impossible to fully understand Mideaval Europe or Middle East without knowing Christianity and Islam respectively. However, it seems to me California needs to strictly define what constitutes merely learning about, and proselytizing a religion if this program is to continue.

American law technically does not allow teaching religion in public schools, but as a practical matter, teaching a religion can't be avoided. In a community of Baptists, like in Southern States, students learn about Bible thumping and soul winning (hallelujah). In a community of Jews, like in Michigan or Illinois, students make dreidels at Christmas. In a community of Mormons, like in Utah or Arizona, students learn about the lost Hebrew tribes becoming American Indians.



When you think of it, it's kind of funny.

I am sick and tired of liberals and atheists. Our country was founded and built of Christian concepts and now we are turning our backs on the good and accepting the ways of evil.
God Bless this country and God bless those who still have sense to know that our schools should not be teaching our children religions, period. This is for families to teach.

didn't wash already start another thread claiming that california was forcing islam, and only islam, on its students? i swear i remember having this argument before...