Join in the conversation!
Pick your username
Post in Forums
Create a Profile
Upload Pictures
Make Polls
Keep a Journal
Meet Friends
Have Fun
It's FREE!
Sign Up!
Forum Index: Computers & Internet: Hardware
The next processor?
Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: 1 2
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 10:06:24#1
nothinsnew

Monk
35078 points

Deleted

Send PM


36/NA/The Coast, Australia
Join Date: Feb 2005

So right now we have dual core, quad core and I think octo core.

Does anyone know what people are predicting for the long term for processors?

On September 15, 2009
Amazon.com goodies - Books - Movies - Electronics
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 10:12:24#2
aceuvclubs
let it snow, let it


Monk+
36387 points


Send PM


31/M/Freaking Siberia, Michigan
Join Date: Nov 2007

Skynet

On March 19, 2010
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 10:13:31#3
Wheezy_Knight

Über Master Debater
8192 points


Send PM


53/M/Ankh-Morpork, United Kingdom
Join Date: Aug 2008

As far as electronic processors are concerened, they are supposedly "at the wall" because they can't make them any smaller and still fit circuit pathways due to electron leap(?) ie. The charge cutting across the circuit divide.

(so I've heard)

They are playing with light as a message bearer aren't they?

On April 10, 2009
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 10:14:36#4
nothinsnew

Monk
35078 points

Deleted

Send PM


36/NA/The Coast, Australia
Join Date: Feb 2005

Maybe a good one not an evil one lol

On September 15, 2009
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 10:15:11#5
maximillion
Wooooooo!!!!


Pickle
103231 points


Send PM


31/M/cyberspace paradise, United Ki
Join Date: Aug 2005

aceuvclubs said:

Skynet




On March 19, 2010
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 10:23:10#6
nothinsnew

Monk
35078 points

Deleted

Send PM


36/NA/The Coast, Australia
Join Date: Feb 2005

Wheezy_Knight said:

As far as electronic processors are concerened, they are supposedly "at the wall" because they can't make them any smaller and still fit circuit pathways due to electron leap(?) ie. The charge cutting across the circuit divide.

(so I've heard)

They are playing with light as a message bearer aren't they?



Is that Moore's Law?
On September 15, 2009
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 10:29:41#7
Wheezy_Knight

Über Master Debater
8192 points


Send PM


53/M/Ankh-Morpork, United Kingdom
Join Date: Aug 2008

nothinsnew said:

Is that Moore's Law?


I've just looked that up, and that's not what I mean I think..

If you make the space between each circuit pathway too thin/fine, the current will "jump" across the pathways...like a wire carrying electicity not having adequate insulation, it will 'leak'.
On April 10, 2009
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 10:49:04#8
nothinsnew

Monk
35078 points

Deleted

Send PM


36/NA/The Coast, Australia
Join Date: Feb 2005

So there's no way they can get smaller. So I guess they'll just end up going to 16 core, 32 core etc. and the boxes will get bigger?

On September 15, 2009
New Post! Oct 30, 2008 @ 11:37:36#9
Wheezy_Knight

Über Master Debater
8192 points


Send PM


53/M/Ankh-Morpork, United Kingdom
Join Date: Aug 2008

nothinsnew said:

So there's no way they can get smaller. So I guess they'll just end up going to 16 core, 32 core etc. and the boxes will get bigger?


That is a matter for speculation.


On April 10, 2009
New Post! Nov 28, 2008 @ 23:55:28#11
ShadyFx8

Debater
6233 points


Send PM


18/M/cairns, Australia
Join Date: Jan 2008

Wheezy_Knight said:

As far as electronic processors are concerened, they are supposedly "at the wall" because they can't make them any smaller and still fit circuit pathways due to electron leap(?) ie. The charge cutting across the circuit divide.

(so I've heard)

They are playing with light as a message bearer aren't they?


what part of cpu's have they hit the wall? they cant fit more than 8 cpus into the same unit without it killing itself?
On August 03, 2009
Edited: November 28, 2008 @ 23:56
New Post! Jan 01, 2009 @ 21:12:42#12
WildFire

Debater
6497 points

Banned

Send PM


35/M/S.H.I.E.L.D headquarters,
Join Date: Dec 2008

moores law is about the processor speed doubling

On August 07, 2009
New Post! Mar 25, 2009 @ 02:08:23#13
cyberblade544

Commander
63 points


Send PM


26/M/St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Canada
Join Date: Mar 2009

I think it goes far beyond quad core or octo core in IBM servers. IBM is engineering their own processor for the really big servers. I would have to do more research to tell you exactly what cutting edge today. But, I sure know one thing: you can daisy chain multiple servers together to create what we call an array. By using this technique, you can multiply processing power. The finally machine can be as big as you what man!

On June 22, 2009
New Post! Apr 03, 2009 @ 10:41:12#14
Tako_400
Tomorrow's coming...


Debater+
6037 points


Send PM


17/M/Beirut, Lebanon
Join Date: Apr 2009

The new Xbox is coming out with 16-32 cores in 2011-2012...Or so they say. So I wouldn't be surprised if by 2011 all the cheapest computers have 8 cores at least. Technology is growing faster than we can harness it.

On <span style='color:#cc6633;'>29 minutes ago </span>
New Post! Aug 08, 2009 @ 08:02:50#15
utouchedmymotherboard

General
394 points


Send PM


20/M/manhattan, New York
Join Date: Jan 2009

fiber optic processors is the future.....just think of how fuc**** fast future computers will be

On December 27, 2009
New Post! Sep 25, 2009 @ 20:12:10#16
nickolai51

Recruit
5 points


Send PM


29/M/Braintree, United Kingdom
Join Date: Sep 2009

I agree that processors have reached their smallest by using 40nm or 45nm (I forget which) transistors. So I reckon Intel are just going to increase the number of Cores, but I expect IBM or AMD are going to find some way around this "wall".

On September 25, 2009
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: 1 2

TFS Time: Fri 19 Mar 2010 05:37 pm CDT
Copyright © 2004-2010 Funky Llama Productions, LLC   |   Home   |   Contact   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service   |   Top of Page
The Forum Site - Your premier source for everything
Hate ads?