Join in the conversation!
Pick your username
Post in Forums
Create a Profile
Upload Pictures
Make Polls
Keep a Journal
Meet Friends
Have Fun
It's FREE!
Sign Up!
Forum Index: News & Politics: Conspiracies
Proof 9/11 was faked
Locked
AuthorMessage
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 6 · >>
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 05:42:39#31
boxerdc
rumpledforeskin


Monk+
30634 points


Send PM


48/M/Inside the Beltway, Maryland
Join Date: Nov 2008

JellyBeans said:

Where the hell was Homeland Security that day?



It didn't exist until after 9/11.
That you missed that small detail tells me everything I need to know about the rest of your post.
On March 19, 2010
Amazon.com goodies - Books - Movies - Electronics
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 05:46:04#32
El_Tino
booyaka!

Founder
Bogey Man
78362 points


Send PM


30/M/Las Cruces, New Mexico
Join Date: Oct 2004

MartianLeader said:

Well you might have to read more of wants on here. But you'll get the reasons why 9/11 was a fraud.


link [www.disclose.tv]



That's proof that anyone can say anything and post it on the internet.
On March 19, 2010
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 09:00:30#33
crazylikeafox

Über Master Debater
8279 points


Send PM


25/M/Arvada, Colorado
Join Date: Nov 2008

JellyBeans said:

The General in the video recording isn't saying that it "never" happened.

He's saying yes it happened... both towers were brought down and the Pentagon was hit... but it wasn't done by Airplanes... it was done by missiles and explosives & it had nothing to do with Terrorists... it was an Inside job. The reason for the US being in Iraq is purely to do with Oil's and Minerals... it was the same with the Balkans over a decade ago... and the only way to get into that region was to have a reason to attack them.

Your government administration is responsible for all those lovely people that lost their lives that day and many others to follow from 9/11 related illnesses.

There has NOT to this day been video footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon... and the best excuse they can come up with for that one is that the camera didn't pick up a threat! LOL! It picked up a security guard walking around earlier but not a Whole plane??

Where the hell was Homeland Security that day? They picked up Aaron Russo - major Director - floating outside the IRA building in less than 20 minutes... but they couldn't pick up a plane heading for ALL major security protected buildings on that day? Did they all go on Vacation in September?

There are so many News broadcasts that went out that day that are fishy.

There's a broadcast on Youtube from that very morning where the camera is on the towers and you don't see a second plane hit the building at all... all you see is an explosion... then the same footage released later shows the tower from the same angle being hit by a plane! ... a plane that continuously changes colour and size in video and photographs! Some people say the plane was quiet, some say it was loud and "Screaming" and in another video taken at the exact time the first plane hit... the guy in it doesn't even notice the Humongous low flying screaming plane... but hears the explosion!!! Is he just dense? or was the plane inserted later?

Come On!!!

Honestly... your Government is lying to you and the rest of the world and you are all believing the lies because you are afraid of what it means. And yes... it is scary... it scares me to think what kind of world i have brought my kids into... but i refuse to be lied to and take it.

I'm only a new member so i can't post links on here... but if you do a little research about 9/11, you'll find enough evidence to show that all the lies don't match up.

xx J


OK Jellybeans, then how do you rig a building to explode like the twin towers did without any of the workers, tourists, or visitors noticing it? How do you convince an entire city of people they saw a plane that never existed? MIB isn't real, there's no such thing as a neuralizer (unless that's what they WANT us to think). What is a department that hasn't been created yet supposed to do to prevent it? How do you keep all the people involved from leaking the information? Watergate was leaked, and that involved a group of people whose sole purpose was stopping leaks and wasn't NEARLY as intricate as this operation would have to be.
On March 19, 2010
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 10:57:17#34
trillian

Ogler
20291 points


Send PM


38/F/derbyshire, United Kingdom
Join Date: Jun 2006

wow, airplane shaped missiles holding people o them. that si so clever. why didnt anyone else think of that??? and even holding passengers that were phoneing their families and loved ones to say goodbye.
crickey me. whatever will we think of next.
aeroplane shaped missiles!!!!!

On March 07, 2010
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 11:39:28#35
JellyBeans

Über-General
491 points

Deleted

Send PM


26/F/Sydney, Australia
Join Date: Jul 2009

Hi crazylikeafox,


crazylikeafox said:
How do you keep all the people involved from leaking the information?


... it has been leaked.
Norman Mineta confessed in the 9/11 Commission Report that Vice President Cheney over-rid any orders to stop the attack on the Pentagon. They referred to a plane being the object to hit the Pentagon (even though there was not one piece of shrapnel found at the site only an hour or so after the attack)... Mineta's confession was taken out of the testimony and he left his job. He was made to look like a fool and his comments were changed.


crazylikeafox said:

... how do you rig a building to explode like the twin towers did without any of the workers, tourists, or visitors noticing it?


As for buildings being rigged with explosives ... you would need the authorization and complete Co-operation of the security company working for those buildings at the time.

What a coincidence that the company with the contract to supply security to the towers was "Securacom" and it was Marvin P. Bush - President Bush's younger brother that was the Principal for that company.
Another coincidence was that his contract with the Towers ended exactly on the day the 9/11 attacks were undertaken. He has refused to answer any questions on the matter.

Also you stated that people in the buildings, workers, tourists etc, would have noticed the building's being rigged... That may be true... but if you have the support of the Tower/s security company... that would leave you with many night hours and even restricted areas to access when nobody is around and no witnesses. And to do two building's like that may have taken up to a year... so there could have been a lot of "Maintenance" done during that period of time... if you know what I'm saying.

You now have Architects and Demolitionists coming out and asking for the case to be re-opened... they firmly believe that the buildings were brought down with precision demolition techniques.


crazylikeafox said:
]How do you convince an entire city of people they saw a plane that never existed?


How do you convince an entire city to believe there were planes... well... if you were watching the news that morning like a lot of people were ... then you would most likely have been watching NBC, FOX or CNN and so on...
You should take note that the people being interviewed over the phone "live" that claim to have seen a "plane", have direct ties to the networks:

Sean Murtagh - CNN Vice President of Finance
Owen Moogan - FOX News Producer
Mark Obenhaus - Senior ABC Producer
Dr. J. Atlasberg - News Reporter
Mark D. Birnbach - FOX TV employee
Eric Shawn - FOX TV senior Correspondent
Jeanne Yurman - CNN reporter
Winston Mitchell - TV Producer
Jane Derenowski - MSNBC Producer
Elliot Walker - NBC Producer

The list goes on...

As for the people on the street... they have been documented as saying that they "Heard" a sound "Like" a plane or a "Loud BOOM" ... but not that they actually saw a plane. Those that state they saw the plane are tied to the companies listed above.

So... if you were told over and over again that it was a plane and shown it on TV... despite not having seen the plane yourself... then of course you would believe it. I did! But when you start trying to put all this information together... you notice that it doesn't fit together... there are too many holes... and too many affiliates.


crazylikeafox said:
Watergate was leaked, and that involved a group of people whose sole purpose was stopping leaks and wasn't NEARLY as intricate as this operation would have to be.


Intricate... that i believe. It has taken a lot of cooperation. And all for different reasons... but one in the same. War and Gain. Everyone who has participated would believe that the Middle East needed to be invaded for some type of resource or Economical gain.

I can understand that this is all a lot to take in and believe. It's horrific. Professionals have been working for the past 8 years to understand what happened that day.
And I don't believe that the people that argue this is just a crazy "Conspiracy" are idiots... it took a lot of energy to make everyone believe that what happened WAS all TRUE as told on the news... so do your own research. Listen to your gut instinct. See the repetition of War and Mind Control that are in our history books. And decide for yourself.

If no-one can believe what I have written, I can't change that. But I can try and give people the information that so many refuse to let out and other refuse to find out.

xx J
On November 05, 2009
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 11:45:56#36
JellyBeans

Über-General
491 points

Deleted

Send PM


26/F/Sydney, Australia
Join Date: Jul 2009

Ooops... not Homeland Security...

... Correction: "Securacom" or "Stratesec" ...

My regards!

xx J

On November 05, 2009
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 13:30:21#37
boxerdc
rumpledforeskin


Monk+
30634 points


Send PM


48/M/Inside the Beltway, Maryland
Join Date: Nov 2008

JellyBeans said:

Also you stated that people in the buildings, workers, tourists etc, would have noticed the building's being rigged... That may be true... but if you have the support of the Tower/s security company... that would leave you with many night hours and even restricted areas to access when nobody is around and no witnesses. And to do two building's like that may have taken up to a year... so there could have been a lot of "Maintenance" done during that period of time... if you know what I'm saying.


You have so obviously never been to NYC, and never seen the world trade towers, or lower manhattan. I was living there on 9/11, had lived there since 1986, and left in 2004. The trade towers were never empty, they were NEVER unoccupied not even for one minute a day. There was a train station, 3 subway lines, and over 100 shops and restaurants in the complex, not to mention windows on the world and the observation deck.
There were nearly 25,000 people that worked in those buildings, not including the building staff itself, and even at the slowest times, in the middle of the night there were hundreds of people in those towers..

So your theory is bunk.

JellyBeans said:

As for the people on the street... they have been documented as saying that they "Heard" a sound "Like" a plane or a "Loud BOOM" ... but not that they actually saw a plane. Those that state they saw the plane are tied to the companies listed above.


Again. I lived there. I saw the second plane hit. They were planes, there were jet engines pulled out of the storefronts of the buildings across the street, and I saw the second plane hit the south tower. There was no explosion when the towers dropped, there was the rumble of hundreds of thousands of tons of building failing, but no explosion before they collapsed.
Again. Your theory is bunk.
On March 19, 2010
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 13:36:56#38
claudibee
I will NOT!!


Ogler+
20840 points

Deleted

Send PM


49/F/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Oct 2008

trillian said:

same here. i lost a friend in that. and there is no way it was faked. come on. the entire world saw it happen



A friend of mine spent a panic-stricken few days over 9/11 because of her mother working so close by (and she couldn't get hold of her). She was ok but it was a close run thing. No fakery.
On November 13, 2009
New Post! Jul 07, 2009 @ 17:41:21#39
MartianLeader
Arnie Cunningham


Monk+
33292 points


Send PM


22/F/Darnell's Garage,
Join Date: Jun 2008

Thanks Jelly bean for the support.

On March 12, 2010
New Post! Jul 08, 2009 @ 01:32:09#40
JellyBeans

Über-General
491 points

Deleted

Send PM


26/F/Sydney, Australia
Join Date: Jul 2009

Hi boxerdc,


boxerdc said:

You have so obviously never been to NYC, and never seen the world trade towers, or lower manhattan. I was living there on 9/11, had lived there since 1986, and left in 2004. The trade towers were never empty, they were NEVER unoccupied not even for one minute a day. There was a train station, 3 subway lines, and over 100 shops and restaurants in the complex, not to mention windows on the world and the observation deck.
There were nearly 25,000 people that worked in those buildings, not including the building staff itself, and even at the slowest times, in the middle of the night there were hundreds of people in those towers..

So your theory is bunk.


Sorry to disappoint you but I have been there... In NYC and In the World Trade Towers only one month prior to the attacks occurring. I know it's hard for you to understand how a WHOLE building or two or three (Because WT7 went down too even though NO PLANE hit that one... Steel Buildings don't symmetrically fall down by themselves in record time) ... could be rigged without people seeing workers, but here:

Ben Fountain - People Magazine:

"... How could they let this happen? They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we had been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual. I think they had an inkling something was going on ..."


Scott Forbes - Fiduciary Trust testified to "Evacuations". He also states that the weekend before the attacks (9th & 10th September) the Upper Half of the South Tower was Powered Down for close to 36 hrs. Scott Forbes had worked in the Building for 13 years and had never experienced a "Power Down" before.


So... I'm not talking about people on the street, or people in the 100 restaurants who wouldn't care if "Engineers" are walking in and out of the Buildings... the employees themselves had seen the strange going's on that were occurring right before the Towers were "Hit".

It's obviously not impossible to evacuate a building that large then, to do "maintenance" which did inevitably leave the building/s "unoccupied" as you stated. This would have also left "Engineers" with many night hours and no supervision to charge the building/s at free will.


boxerdc said:
Again. I lived there. I saw the second plane hit. They were planes, there were jet engines pulled out of the storefronts of the buildings across the street, and I saw the second plane hit the south tower. There was no explosion when the towers dropped, there was the rumble of hundreds of thousands of tons of building failing, but no explosion before they collapsed.
Again. Your theory is bunk.


Please watch Richard Gage (member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) on Youtube.

Were you looking out of your window when you saw the plane? or were you watching your TV? If you were watching the Towers and saw first hand, the planes entering the buildings then I can't dispute that you "saw" a plane. That means that you could even convince me that there was a plane! But if you were watching the TV... then anyone can say that they saw a plane!

The engine that they found in Murray street was half the size of the engine that was supposed to come from a 767 plane. You could assume that parts of it broke off and fell elsewhere... but where?

Why was the engine rusted if it had just came from a plane that would have been inspected as flight worthy?

Wouldn't it have just been chard beyond recognition if it had hit a building that exploded on impact?

Where are the other pieces of that plane? In an NBC live morning shot... the footage shows the nose of flight 175 exiting the building... where did the nose land? did anybody find that enormous piece of evidence? or did that magically com-bust in mid air and land as dust just like the Towers did?


Someone also asked about all those people that called from the planes whilst in mid air:

Flight 11 -
Betty Ong
Madeline Sweeney

Flight 175 -
Brian Sweeney
unnamed flight attendant

That's only 4 people on two major flights.

Flight 175 climbed 3000 feet in 1 minute... which means that the G-Forces applied to that airplane would have caused the pilot and the passengers to pass out sometime before impact. Maybe the "Hijacker" put the plane on "Auto-Pilot"... but then that doesn't explain how the passengers were still able to be conscious and make phone calls right before impact.

Brian Sweeney was documented as calling his wife and mother at 8.58am then at 9.00am he calls his parents a second time... at 9.03am ... the plane crashes into the building.
Why didn't he pass out before impact?

I'm giving you all possible explanations for the scenario that there were actually planes... but seeings as how the plane codes were changed in mid-air (according to Dave Bottiglia of NA Traffic Controller/ NY Center) and flight 175 was lost after the steep incline of 3000 Feet... couldn't you at least consider the idea that that plane was either set down somewhere else and a missile took over it's code and path whilst those people were murdered somewhere else ... And if there was NO plane... then those "Passengers" could have been held in the building and forced to make those calls and then have their bodies recovered later.

I know that all sounds awful and I'm in no way trying to belittle what has happened... esp to the victims.

But truth be told... the lies that surround 9/11 are too big to ignore.


MartianLeader said:

Thanks Jelly bean for the support.


You're welcome

xx J
On November 05, 2009
New Post! Jul 08, 2009 @ 02:45:55#41
kentoo

Minister
14864 points


Send PM


61/M/Salmon Arm, Canada
Join Date: Jun 2008

JellyBeans said:

:





Flight 175 climbed 3000 feet in 1 minute... which means that the G-Forces applied to that airplane would have caused the pilot and the passengers to pass out sometime before impact. Maybe the "Hijacker" put the plane on "Auto-Pilot"... but then that doesn't explain how the passengers were still able to be conscious and make phone calls right before impact.



xx J


I have a little trouble with the above... an F18 Hornet climbs at a rate of 45,000 feet per minute, and although the pilot is in a very sophisticated seat, they do not black out... A Beech King Air 350, which is a turbo prop has an initial climb rate of 3000 ft/min... hardly enough to cause anyone to black out.

link [www.aerospaceweb.org]
On February 04, 2010
New Post! Jul 08, 2009 @ 02:58:35#42
kentoo

Minister
14864 points


Send PM


61/M/Salmon Arm, Canada
Join Date: Jun 2008

On February 04, 2010
Edited: July 08, 2009 @ 02:59
New Post! Jul 08, 2009 @ 03:20:27#43
curiouskat

Minister+
12696 points

Deleted

Send PM


31/F/Adelaide, Australia
Join Date: May 2009

I am all for the theories suggesting 9/11 was used as an excuse to start a war.
The events following the disaster looked remarkably like propoganda,and alot of what Bush said in the lead up to the war didnt make sense.
Why go after Hussein in Iraq when the threat was named as Binladen in Afganistan?
There was clearly no connection between the two.
link [www.washingtonpost.com]

However i think the idea that the entire thing was a hoax is going WAY too far.
We will most likely never know either way...

On February 16, 2010
New Post! Jul 08, 2009 @ 05:42:48#45
boxerdc
rumpledforeskin


Monk+
30634 points


Send PM


48/M/Inside the Beltway, Maryland
Join Date: Nov 2008

I saw the second plane hit the south tower with my own eyes. I was looking at the first tower out of the windows of the mid town office building I was working in, and had a clear view of both of them. We (there were about 2 dozen of us) saw the second plane swing in from over New Jersey and impact the second tower. Not on televison. In real life, with our eyes.

I don't know why I even start posting in these threads, because I think that to call this a conspiricy is so disrespectful to the 350 firefighters who died trying to save people, and to the 2000 people who died in those buildings that I could just spit.

I'm done. I know what happened because I saw it with my own eyes. For you to claim that it was something else is disrespectful and dishonorable to the people who died that day.

On March 19, 2010
Locked<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 6 · >>

TFS Time: Fri 19 Mar 2010 01:47 pm CDT
Copyright © 2004-2010 Funky Llama Productions, LLC   |   Home   |   Contact   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service   |   Top of Page
The Forum Site - Your premier source for everything
Hate ads?