|
 Post in Forums
Create a Profile
Upload Pictures
|
Keep a Journal
Meet Friends
It's FREE!
|
|
Sign Up!
|
Forum Index > News & Politics > Gender Issues |
greyguitar
Debater
5541 points
25/NA/,
Join Date: Feb 2008 | doubtingthomas said: No.
NO.
NO AGIAN.
Dog shows degrade dogs, how do you think dogs at home would feel about seeing other dogs on TV all polished up. It makes them feel inferior to other dogs.
Perhaps the dogs watching the dog shows have a very low opinion of themselfs and we should cater to the dogs at home by baning it all together.
We might want to put a age limit on the dog shows so immature dogs that could possibly be watching won't have thier early devolpment hindered in anyway.
I have a suggestion, why don't the dogs that have a problem with the dog shows simply not watch them and let the rest of the dogs have thier fun and win prizes and stuff.
As woman, I find this analogy to be inapt. Dogs have no need of privacy or modesty. Dogs don't watch other dogs have sex on tv. Dog shows are not about sexualizing dogs. They are about showing the highest standards of their breeds. If porno stars are the highest standard of our breed, then we are in a far sorrier state than previously thought.
Humans have an urge for privacy and modesty, by and large, and porno is invasive into what is usually a private act. That might be part of the attraction as to why it is so popular. Unadorned lust and disinhibited behavior has a taboo quality that is exciting.
It is degrading to women, because those show dog standards are nothing close to real humans. And it makes woman think that in order to be appealing and sexy, they have to have flotation devices surgically implanted in their mammaries and parts of their butts sucked out and injected into their faces. It's not just insecure women, it is setting a standard of sexy that few natural women will ever be like.
It is degrading to intimacy and actual love because it leaves nothing to be discovered. It cheapens the act into a disgusting puddle left on some chick's leg.
The guy is not a guy...he's a penis. The girl is not a girl, she is a hole of release, nothing more. They are not someone's child, brother, sister, mother, or father. They are nasty little bits caught in the act by horny voyeurs who have nothing better to do than imagine their own naughty bits engaged in the act.
They are paid participants and that is akin to prostitution. Therefore, it is glorified prostitution turned into an industry that thrives off of girls who make poor decisions that they will probably regret later, and guys that just want to get laid, cause no matter how many times he sticks his wang in some hot hole, he will still be a stud, while she is a whore, a slut, and other words that I will not regale you with. |  | |
|
doubtingthomas
Debater
6732 points
32/M/monterey, California
Join Date: Mar 2008 | At the risk of receaving a negative Kudo for flaming, I believe you started it.
Quote:
As woman, I find this analogy to be inapt
I feel my analogy was spot on, If you take the word "dog" and put in person and the words "dog show" and put in "porn", I think you get my point loud and clear.
The definition of Analogy is : a similarity between like features of two things, on which a comparison may be based: IE the analogy between the heart and a pump.
The definition of Inept is : inappropriate; unsuitable; out of place. absurd or foolish: IE "an inept remark".
I think the only thing Inept here is your understanding of the word.
In fact you later say.
Quote:
It is degrading to women, because those show dog standards are nothing close to real humans. And it makes woman think that in order to be appealing and sexy, they have to have flotation devices surgically implanted in their mammaries and parts of their butts sucked out and injected into their faces. It's not just insecure women, it is setting a standard of sexy that few natural women will ever be like.
A opinion is not inept because you simply disagree with it.
Teeter-tottering between brilliance and insanity | | | |
|
adonis
Über-Meister
2412 points
Banned
34/M/, United Kingdom
Join Date: Aug 2007 | doubtingthomas said:
At the risk of receaving a negative Kudo for flaming, I believe you started it.
A opinion is not inept because you simply disagree with it.
Sorry, maybe i'm getting confused???
Your into dog porn?????? | | | |
|
yomomma
Meister
1438 points
108/M/hi,
Join Date: Jun 2007 | Oh, -wait... er, just a... second, uhh, okay. I was just finishing up masterbating there. Okay, that's better. Yeah, I think that if people want to watch people who want to shamefully expose themselves on the internet, then that's fine. But it doesn't need to be all over the place. Just watch commercials and you'll see something that would be almost unheard of a hundred years ago. Our children do not need to constantly assaulted with this kind of crap. Seriously, have you been in the girls toy isle? The featured brats and barbies and whatever else they have now are never caught not flaunting their flesh, but for what? Even the creepiest of the creepy little boys (there is a certain stage and gender of life titled "creepy little boys" ) don't look through girls toy catalogues, and if anything all this could possibly do is produce gay tendencies in little girls or drive concerned parents away. I'm a guy, and I think that it's kind of tempting, but I don't even have to google "porn" if I wanted to see those kind of images. What is most disturbing is other guys who think it's hot when they see a guy and a girl (both exposed) together. I can't stand the sight of another dude's wing-wang.
I abstinated last night. It was incredible!
Don't quote me, boy, I ain't said s**t
-Eazy E | | | | Edited: April 06, 2008 @ 02:17 |  |
|
|
odie
Über-Minister
16886 points
Deleted
Banned
107/F/toronto, Canada
Join Date: Sep 2007 | yomomma said:
Oh, -wait... er, just a... second, uhh, okay. I was just finishing up masterbating there. Okay, that's better. Yeah, I think that if people want to watch people who want to shamefully expose themselves on the internet, then that's fine. But it doesn't need to be all over the place. Just watch commercials and you'll see something that would be almost unheard of a hundred years ago. Our children do not need to constantly assaulted with this kind of crap. Seriously, have you been in the girls toy isle? The featured brats and barbies and whatever else they have now are never caught not flaunting their flesh, but for what? Even the creepiest of the creepy little boys (there is a certain stage and gender of life titled "creepy little boys" ) don't look through girls toy catalogues, and if anything all this could possibly do is produce gay tendencies in little girls or drive concerned parents away. I'm a guy, and I think that it's kind of tempting, but I don't even have to google "porn" if I wanted to see those kind of images. What is most disturbing is other guys who think it's hot when they see a guy and a girl (both exposed) together. I can't stand the sight of another dude's wing-wang.
glad you shared masterbating with us.......where else can a girl go to hear this?
 | | | |
Top
|
Apr 05, 2008 @ 21:15:20
