Forum Index > News & Politics
Jul 25, 2006 @ 12:12:21 | #1 | treebee point whore spanker Über-Moderator 147767 points


38/F/Escaped!!!, United Kingdom Join Date: Oct 2005 | I had a very interesting conversation last night about how media is very different worldwide. How News is worded, how it can be so biased by the Governments of the originating countries.
How "worldwide" we are given different priorities via our education and upbringing. Of course the government completely run our education systems, therefore we are rarely taught anything that is not our governments policy for us to learn.
My freind has been working in Japan for a year, shes going back real soon for another year. She was telling me about how the media and government work there and how there is a national ethic.
At first it sounded shocking but actually thinking about it, isnt patriotism the same thing?
Anyways my point being very similar to Doug's last week. About getting a whole story, getting opinions from both sides before drawing your own conclusions.
Reading through the Israel/Lebnanon threads i can see how media works, i can see how people have absolutely different views because geographically they are a long way away from each other and they are subjected to different media.
I know quite a few people on here DO take a look at the news in asia, africa, americas, australasia, europe and can draw thier own conclusions from this.
All i really want to say is, in another part of the world the same story can be told in a very different way. So please, check sources, look from all angels and please think for yourselves.
 link [www.thebreastcancersite.com] Please click to save a life 
Teresa is a doll that should be purchased for regular playtime - Googlism | | |
Jul 25, 2006 @ 12:41:40 | #3 | babyrs Discipline Mistress
36102 points


33/F/, Singapore Join Date: Jan 2006 | Couldn't agree with you more.
I find that many people unwittingly get influenced by the media. Sometimes it's hard to create a personal opinion when we're constantly exposed to reports generated by the local media, which may be bound by their own internal red tape and agenda. Especially in cases whereby the government has the 'silent' final say in a lot of matters in relation to the country, to base our opinion and viewpoints simply on these reports would be akin to letting ourselves be dictated on what to think and believe.
There are different and varied styles of reporting events, but to put it mildly, we can never be sure that its told the way the events transpired... more so to expect the local media to give unbiased reports from a stand alone, neutral viewpoint.
For example, Country A has always had great relations with Country B, and would not think twice about rallying behind this country and giving support as and when is needed. This 'relationship' needs to be maintained at all costs - perhaps for trade, resources or political gains. One day, Country B decides to declare war on Country C. Chances are, the general response and media reports in Country A in relation to the war will tilt in favour of Country B.
We have to realize the power of the press. Journalists are often so good at crafting stories and manipulating words, that these not-so-neutral views will be glossed over and dished out to the general public, looking simply like a droning report of the events as it unfolds. Never underestimate the power of words coming from good writers - it can affect the mind in ways that we never thought possible, and very easily, as well. We are lulled into believing what we are made to believe.
Always keep an open mind when it comes to worldwide news coming from the media, especially when politics are involved. Ma** communication is a handy tool - it is perhaps the closest the 'people behind the scenes' can get to 'controlling' a country's state of mind.


 | | |
Jul 31, 2006 @ 08:36:41 | #6 | newwealth
Meister 1255 points


48/F/Little Rock, Arkansas Join Date: Jul 2006 | treebee said: just for info, here are the sites that i use for news
link [www.bbc.co.uk]
link [news.bbc.co.uk]
link [www.kommersant.com]
link [www.hindu.com]
link [commentisfree.guardian.co.uk]
link [today.reuters.co.uk]
link [www.atimes.com]
link [www.wnafrica.com]
link [news.bbc.co.uk]
link [news.independent.co.uk]
link [www.news.com.au]
there are so many sources out there thats just a few!
I noticed that most of these are british/uk. None seem to be American .. that is GOOD, LOL. I've held since 1991 that the mainstream American news is nothing less than propaganda and I use many different news sources as well. At one time (as short a time ago as twenty years) American news sources were just that .. news. Now they are opinion and propaganda. I believe that the news media (all countries included) is just as responsible as politics is for many wars and deaths going on around our globe. I don't trust any of them anymore. However, I do tend to trust the BBC/UK sources more than the American sources because when I do my resource, I can find more corrobaration on what those sources report than what the American sources do.
It saddens me that this country (the USA) is not what it was 35 years ago. We were honorable then. Trusted. But over the past two decades or so we've lost that credibility and I believe its due to our media reporting and so called uncensored news. Believe me, it is censored in some way or another before it ever reaches the front page. And, in some case, many cases, matter of fact, the editors and reporters are not using credible sources and later have to print retractions .. however, the damage, by that time is already done.
 "Learn to write your hurts in sand, carve your blessings in stone-unknown" | | |
Jul 31, 2006 @ 10:09:02 | #7 | treebee point whore spanker Über-Moderator 147767 points


38/F/Escaped!!!, United Kingdom Join Date: Oct 2005 | newwealth said: I noticed that most of these are british/uk. None seem to be American .. that is GOOD, LOL. I've held since 1991 that the mainstream American news is nothing less than propaganda and I use many different news sources as well. At one time (as short a time ago as twenty years) American news sources were just that .. news. Now they are opinion and propaganda. I believe that the news media (all countries included) is just as responsible as politics is for many wars and deaths going on around our globe. I don't trust any of them anymore. However, I do tend to trust the BBC/UK sources more than the American sources because when I do my resource, I can find more corrobaration on what those sources report than what the American sources do.
It saddens me that this country (the USA) is not what it was 35 years ago. We were honorable then. Trusted. But over the past two decades or so we've lost that credibility and I believe its due to our media reporting and so called uncensored news. Believe me, it is censored in some way or another before it ever reaches the front page. And, in some case, many cases, matter of fact, the editors and reporters are not using credible sources and later have to print retractions .. however, the damage, by that time is already done.
i dont know what news sources in the USA are credible.
 link [www.thebreastcancersite.com] Please click to save a life 
Teresa is a doll that should be purchased for regular playtime - Googlism | | |
Top
|