Post in Forums
Create a Profile
Upload Pictures
Keep a Journal
Meet Friends
It's FREE!
Sign Up!
Forum Index > News & Politics > Animal Rights
>> Hunting - good or bad?
Reply to Topic
Search Topic
Subscription
Author Message
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5
New Post! Aug 12, 2008 @ 00:51:48#61
blacksheepgoodgirl

Apprentice
32 points


Send PM


30/NA/temple hills,
Join Date: Aug 2008

hunting is bad

blacksheepgoodgirl last visited August 12, 2008
New Post! Aug 13, 2008 @ 21:07:32#62
noxus

Über-General
498 points


Send PM


45/M/Oroville, California
Join Date: Aug 2008

l_teddy10 said:
I think hunting is ok, as long as it's not something like Rino's and crap in Africa.

People in the UK hunt crap in Africa? Thats some twisted stuff dude.
noxus last visited January 04, 2009
New Post! Aug 17, 2008 @ 00:58:35#63
kentoo

Debater
6949 points


Send PM


60/M/Salmon Arm, Canada
Join Date: Jun 2008

Hunting for sport in my opinion is questionable.
Being a hunter and fisherman since I was a child, I do take pleasure in both pursuits but not for the same reasons that most sport hunters do. For myself hunting and fishing is a means of procuring food. If I kill a deer or moose it is the meat that I treasure , not the antlers or hide, although the hide is of value too. Fish I view in the same manner ... I do not adorn my walls with their preserved skins and acutally pa** by the trophy deer and moose for younger animals. Any trout that I happen to catch exceeding ten pounds are released. The game that I take myself is prefered to all other sources of meat.


Intent is the measure of heart

kentoo last visited January 08, 2009
New Post! Aug 25, 2008 @ 23:23:40#64
vegansoldier

Recruit
3 points


Send PM


30/M/,
Join Date: Aug 2008

Hunting is not better or worse than eating a hamburger. It is conflicting pain to a living creature without the need for it.

vegansoldier last visited August 25, 2008
New Post! Oct 02, 2008 @ 07:53:59#65
BrokenRose

Points Whore
847 points


Send PM


17/NA/Auckland, New Zealand
Join Date: Oct 2008

A serial killer could get sentenced to life or get the death penalty for going on a thrill kill, yet if someone kills another animal for fun it's considered a sport? I don't get it, what's the difference? In the end both victims end up dead yet one killer gets time and the other gets rewarded. We may as well let human hunting be a sport if this is our attitude, but nooo...humans are too arrogant to even consider the fact that we are animals too!


Personality type: INTP
Intelligence type: Intrapersonal

BrokenRose last visited December 01, 2008
New Post! Oct 06, 2008 @ 18:01:02#66
KodiakGirl

Recruit
6 points


Send PM


24/F/panama, Florida
Join Date: Oct 2008

ohh man, I thought for a second that I was dreaming but I am not so lucky... I have seen posts on here Hunting for Conservation... you are seriously only kidding yourselves.

In the state of New York alone we need to kill 40 percent of the does according to the DEC just to maintain the population. 40 percent!?! the thing is populations of animals are on the rise in small areas, which means that these animals are being inbred, and are also more likely to spread disease between each other. We have had such adverse affects on wildlife, by killing the biggest and strongest dominant males, hunting endangered species, offering bounties on body parts of animals...

I am sorry but if you are reading or typing in this forum you have no need to hunt. You obviously live close enough to civilization... so you dont do it for survival.

I wish hunters would just admit they hunt because they like to kill, not for any other reasons.

KodiakGirl last visited October 07, 2008
New Post! Oct 07, 2008 @ 21:45:44#67
kentoo

Debater
6949 points


Send PM


60/M/Salmon Arm, Canada
Join Date: Jun 2008

KodiakGirl said:


I am sorry but if you are reading or typing in this forum you have no need to hunt. You obviously live close enough to civilization... so you dont do it for survival.

I wish hunters would just admit they hunt because they like to kill, not for any other reasons.


There are exceptions to the above statement. I live where out my back door is wilderness and out my front door is "civilization". We have an abundance of wildlife such that seven foot fences are required to keep the deer out. There are some of us who could raise a steer or two and butcher them at a the cost of several hundred dollars a piece but find it cheaper to buy a hunting liscence and tag at just about sixty dollars and take a moose or elk.
I dont like killing any animal; however since I do eat meat, I would prefer to take the responsiblity myself for the life of the animals I eat rather than paying someone at an abattoir to do the job.


Intent is the measure of heart
kentoo last visited January 08, 2009
Edited: October 07, 2008 @ 21:51
New Post! Oct 09, 2008 @ 03:26:26#68
soupnazi

Meister
1189 points


Send PM


41/NA/Cincinnati,
Join Date: Oct 2008

treebee said:
Most forms of hunting are now banned in the UK, fox hunting, stag hunting, hare coursing etc etc i think the only legal hunting now is birds.

Having watched Louis Theroux in South Africa on the big game hunting, it got me thinking. It costs $40,000 to kill a lion in a well run legal game park, this money goes into the conservation of more lions. So for every one you kill, another 10 are raised. There is big money still in big game hunting and basically if it was outlawed many families would be completely broke. One man spoke of Zimbabwe and how people just fell into poverty once the big game hunting was disallowed.

Do you feel it hypocritical to buy sausages or a rack of ribs or a pack of steaks and at the same time object to hunting animals?

Do you feel it is a mans right to hunt an animal with fair play, well trained to make a quick kill?

Whats the difference between animals in farms, bred for meat and animals on big game ranches?



Of course it is hypocritical to object to hunting while eating a burger. Or wearing leather.

hunting around the world may be good or bad and I confess I know little about it outside the USA.

But here I can tell you it is beneficial and overwhelmingly so. Remember man has always been a predator and part of nature we are carnivores and always have been the fact is tat removing a predator from the environment is very harmful tot he balance and that includes man.


NOMORESOUPFORU
soupnazi last visited December 25, 2008
New Post! Oct 09, 2008 @ 03:28:24#69
soupnazi

Meister
1189 points


Send PM


41/NA/Cincinnati,
Join Date: Oct 2008

yomomma said:
Human hunting is generally frowned upon. So is animal hunting, come to think of it.


Where do you live?

Animal hunting is seldom frowned upon except maybe in elitist circles


NOMORESOUPFORU
soupnazi last visited December 25, 2008
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5

Top

TFS Time: Thu 08 Jan 2009 12:15 am CST
Copyright © 2004-2009 Funky Llama Productions, LLC   |   Home   |   Contact   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of service
Proudly hosted by Liquid Web

 
The Forum Site - Your premier source for everything