Forum Index > News & Politics > Election 2008
 Apr 29, 2008 @ 03:48:41 | #36 | saegespaene
Über-Minister
15430 points
107/M/Auf dem Holzhaufen, Connecticu
Join Date: Jan 2008 | richreality said: so-o-o-o-o, was the original question, vote for Hillary?, based on just being a women or on her stance? Got a bit lost there 
No,...the only question(s) posed in the OP were:
"Let us be honest, where is this country going, or when should it be growing? I'm not bad mouthing Republicans, but what have they achieved?"
Three in total, essentially advocated a change in the ruling political party (...but, not necessarily suggesting that it must be a change to the Democratic Party). 
The problem is that there are not enough unaffiliated, independantly wealthy types out there, that are dumb enough to want to run for the office. 
 |  | | Edited: April 29, 2008 @ 03:51 |  |
|
| Apr 29, 2008 @ 13:02:49 | #37 | jonnythan
Abominable Snowman
89378 points
27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005 | saegespaene said: No,...the only question(s) posed in the OP were:
"Let us be honest, where is this country going, or when should it be growing? I'm not bad mouthing Republicans, but what have they achieved?"
Three in total, essentially advocated a change in the ruling political party (...but, not necessarily suggesting that it must be a change to the Democratic Party).
The problem is that there are not enough unaffiliated, independantly wealthy types out there, that are dumb enough to want to run for the office.
Given the thread title of "Hillary the President" I say that the OP was definitely suggesting not only a specific party but a specific candidate.
My Flickr
 | | | |
Top
|
