|
 Post in Forums
Create a Profile
Upload Pictures
|
Keep a Journal
Meet Friends
It's FREE!
|
|
Sign Up!
|
Forum Index > News & Politics > Gender Issues | >> Governements secret gender war?? | | |
|
raditz8526
Monk
35828 points
30/M/,
Join Date: Mar 2006 | lili said:
I had a full time job at $9 an hour. After taxes were taken out, take home pay worked out to about $7.50/hr. Daycare is on average $5 an hour. Show me a person who can live on $2.50 an hour to pay for rent, food, clothing, and transportation.
Math is all the proof you need.
I never said anyone could live off of $2.50 an hour. |  | |
|
jmo
Über-Monkey
55931 points
18/M/Dandyland, United Kingdom
Join Date: May 2006 | treebee said: Well some argue that they have no right to take what is rightfully ours, we earned the money 
Others argue that: in a country where people are complaining constantly about benefit fraud and illegal immigrants they want the government to hold a tighter reign.
One way of controlling this is to make us claim back our money. If you are working under a false insurance number you would think twice about claiming twice a year for what you have illegally earned.
If you are making a fraudulent claim, chances of getting caught are increased.
However it is pushing the benefit state. This goes back to gra** roots communism where whats ours is thiers and whats thiers is thiers. Only by playing thier game do we get what is rightfully ours in the first place.
We suffer as a result of having a convservative stronghold for so long where we are encouraged to acumulate, become property owners, privatise our companies, give money back to the people. Then putting in a labor government who basically decides to create a benefit state.
In order to keep what we accumulated in the conservative reign we have to bow down to the new benefit state that labour has pushed in.
In other words people like me who had kids in the 90's and started on the property ladder are now at the mercy of the government. I could loose everything if i did not play the game. Work the allocated hours and claim back what is mine in order to pay my mortgage.
Labor or Conservative both aim to keep the small man down.
I blame Rupart Murdoch...to be honest I think if Kinnock had got in the situation would now be different. Im not a huge fan of him to be honest, but I think 1992 would have been the perfect time for someone like Kinnock to get in and shake up British politics.
Instead im sitting here thinking I want to vote Labour, purely because their better than the Conservatives.
Is This Ba** Really Strong Enough? | | | |
|
monkeymadness
Ogler
21041 points
24/M/Big Tree, United Kingdom
Join Date: Aug 2006 | jmo said:
The law states that if both parents wish to have custody, and there are no legal reasons why either shouldn't then the child gets the choice.
And if the child cant choose because they are too young they favour the mother, purly because there has to be something there to break a deadlock | | | |
Top
|
Mar 23, 2007 @ 17:42:33
that way the government doesn't actually have any power without minority parties support
