Child Porn.. forums - The Forum Site

Forum Index > News & Politics

>> Child Porn..

Search Topic

Subscription

Author

Message

Pages: << · 1 2 3 ...7 8 9 10 11 · >>

May 09, 2008 @ 14:14:06

#121

charger

Minister
12247 points

38/M/bricktown,
Join Date: Jul 2007

jonnythan said:
Uh, what about it? It's illegal, and always has been.

Do you think it should be made legal or something?

Absolutely!

May 09, 2008 @ 14:15:05

#122

charger

Minister
12247 points

38/M/bricktown,
Join Date: Jul 2007

raditz8526 said:
Still distribution of child porn regardless of their age.

ok, seems a little strict to me! but i appreciate your honest input!

May 09, 2008 @ 14:25:08

#123

raditz8526

Monk
33552 points

30/M/,
Join Date: Mar 2006

charger said:
Absolutely!

That's creepy.

May 09, 2008 @ 14:25:48

#124

jonnythan

Abominable Snowman
88700 points

27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

charger said:
Absolutely!

So you think child porn should be legal, as long as the producers and consumers are all children as well?

That's f**ked up, dude.

My Flickr

jonnythan last visited <font color=#990033>17 minutes ago </font>

Edited: May 09, 2008 @ 14:25

May 09, 2008 @ 14:28:42

#125

charger

Minister
12247 points

38/M/bricktown,
Join Date: Jul 2007

jonnythan said:
So you think child porn should be legal, as long as the producers and
consumers are all children as well?

That's f**ked up, dude.

well they will do it regardless, cannot be held accountable for it and if its the sharing of
personal photos between underage kids, i say yes... like i said kids are going to do it anyway!

my head is not in the sand on this one...

May 09, 2008 @ 14:35:51

#126

raditz8526

Monk
33552 points

30/M/,
Join Date: Mar 2006

charger said:
well they will do it regardless, cannot be held accountable for it and if its the sharing of
personal photos between underage kids, i say yes... like i said kids are going to do it anyway!

my head is not in the sand on this one...

They are going to do it regardless, so it should be legal! People are going to murder people anyway, so lets legalize that too! After all, they will do it regardless!

May 09, 2008 @ 14:40:31

#127

charger

Minister
12247 points

38/M/bricktown,
Join Date: Jul 2007

raditz8526 said:
They are going to do it regardless, so it should be legal! People are
going to murder people anyway, so lets legalize that too! After all, they will do it regardless!

no, raditz! we are talking about possible pornography...that is an extreme and weak stance!

May 09, 2008 @ 14:51:26

#128

treebee
mmm pistol whip
Über-Moderator
154927 points

38/F/Escaped!!!, United Kingdom
Join Date: Oct 2005

raditz8526 said:
Most states in the U.S. the AOC is 16. I think one is younger than that. Just because someone is over the age of consent doesn't mean they can consent to making a porn though.

This is getting confusing, the thread is about underage teens sending rude photos to one another and how when one of them comes of age, if they are still in posession of the photo they can be charged with having child porn.

I have no idea where the law stands on an age of consent to make porn, although i do remember the case of Traci Lords who was 17 i think at the time, but this is digressing from the original point.

link [www.thebreastcancersite.com] Please click to save a life

Teresa is a doll that should be purchased for regular playtime - Googlism

May 09, 2008 @ 14:54:43

#129

charger

Minister
12247 points

38/M/bricktown,
Join Date: Jul 2007

treebee said:
This is getting confusing, the thread is about underage teens sending rude
photos to one another and how when one of them comes of age, if they are still in posession
of the photo they can be charged with having child porn.

I have no idea where the law stands on an age of consent to make porn, although i do
remember the case of Traci Lords who was 17 i think at the time, but this is digressing from
the original point.

she was 16 and i have all the tapes...

May 09, 2008 @ 14:54:44

#130

raditz8526

Monk
33552 points

30/M/,
Join Date: Mar 2006

treebee said:
This is getting confusing, the thread is about underage teens sending rude photos to one another and how when one of them comes of age, if they are still in posession of the photo they can be charged with having child porn.

I have no idea where the law stands on an age of consent to make porn, although i do remember the case of Traci Lords who was 17 i think at the time, but this is digressing from the original point.

Here it would depend on the state. I think to be involved in porn they are all 18.

May 09, 2008 @ 14:55:20

#131

raditz8526

Monk
33552 points

30/M/,
Join Date: Mar 2006

charger said:
she was 16 and i have all the tapes...

That is not the least bit surprising.

May 09, 2008 @ 14:55:40

#132

treebee
mmm pistol whip
Über-Moderator
154927 points

38/F/Escaped!!!, United Kingdom
Join Date: Oct 2005

it was my fault for bringing it up in the first place

link [www.thebreastcancersite.com] Please click to save a life
Teresa is a doll that should be purchased for regular playtime - Googlism

May 09, 2008 @ 14:56:23

#133

raditz8526

Monk
33552 points

30/M/,
Join Date: Mar 2006

charger said:
no, raditz! we are talking about possible pornography...that is an extreme and weak stance!

If one crime can be excused by claiming "Oh, they will do it, just let them," why can't others?

May 09, 2008 @ 14:57:28

#134

angelcake

Über-Monkey
54648 points

18/F/Eastleigh, United Kingdom
Join Date: Aug 2006

charger said:
21 really? wow, that seems a little up there, but i guess that makes sense... how about the
sharing of photos between underager's via the net?

I don't think thats a good idea tbh, if they uploaded it to somewhere then it probably would go horribly wrong!! If kids take a pic of their gf doing something on their phone and it stays there its one thing...but putting it onto the internet...eep.

Come into my bed I want to know, know you..

angelcake is online! (Last active within 5 minutes)

May 09, 2008 @ 15:00:00

#135

charger

Minister
12247 points

38/M/bricktown,
Join Date: Jul 2007

raditz8526 said:
That is not the least bit surprising.

oh, cmon raditz lighten up, im just joking around actually i never owned them, but i know of
her mainly through when i went over a friends house about 20 years ago and it was playing
and they filled me in on the details, she also was cast in some of john waters films but as an
actress not porn star...

<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

Pages: << · 1 2 3 ...7 8 9 10 11 · >>

Top