Forum Index > News & Politics
>> Child Porn..
Reply to Topic
Search Topic
Subscription
Author Message
Pages: 1 2 3 ...9 10 11 · >>

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:22:56#1
unspokenwords

Points Whore Master
62893 points


Send PM


22/F/In la la land.,
Join Date: Sep 2005

I just turned on the radio and they were talking about this, the question was if you have naughty pictures of yourself or your bf/gf being underage on your computer or uploaded to a site if it would be considered child porn when you turned 18 and you'd get in trouble for it? what do you all think? (They can't seem to figure it out on the radio station, lol)


"You fondle my trigger, then you blame my gun"

unspokenwords is online! (Last active within 8 minutes)
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:24:21#2
plebian_angel

Über-Meister
2370 points


Send PM


33/NA/,
Join Date: Apr 2008

I think any pics under 18 is consdiered child porn and I think it should be. But I could be wrong too


Bite me...like you mean it.

plebian_angel last visited <font color=#990033>31 minutes ago </font>
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:24:58#3
adrinachrome

Debater
5175 points


Send PM


25/M/Tucson, Arizona
Join Date: Apr 2008

If it was on your computer and it was you and your girlfriend would it be considered child porn? by law probably but I dont think by morals. If it was uploaded onto the internet, then yes it would be child porn. At least I think so. I am glad I ain't the person who makes these laws up.


clever got me this far then tricky got me in

adrinachrome last visited <font color=#990033>6 minutes ago </font>
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:27:45#4
unspokenwords

Points Whore Master
62893 points


Send PM


22/F/In la la land.,
Join Date: Sep 2005

lets says you are a 16 year old boy who has naughty pics of you with your gf or something.. and then down the road you still have them not deleting them but you're now 18, you can get charged for pics you took being 16..?

that is kinda crazy .. but..

kids shouldn't be taking those types of pics anyways but plenty do I'm sure..


"You fondle my trigger, then you blame my gun"

unspokenwords is online! (Last active within 8 minutes)
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:28:20#5
alexkidd

Monk
33765 points


Send PM


22/M/limerick, Ireland
Join Date: Sep 2006

child porn is porographic images of children,
so yes.

what age are we talking here?, like 15/16 say, is possessing images of your 15 yr old girlfriend illegal if you're 15?
i guess technically it is, you're not old enough to consent to having that photo taken, no matter who takes it.
it obviously wouldn't be dealt with as severely.

but uploading it is certainly illegal and would be, thats circulating pornographic images of children.


alexkidd last visited May 12, 2008
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:28:47#6
skins

Debater
6860 points


Send PM


41/M/medway, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2006

It is child porn by law and for once, I
agree with the law. Rude under 18's pics?
Child porn


I eat f**king chickens,
and don't f**k lesbians.
No offence.

skins last visited May 12, 2008
0 Kudos   Edited: May 08, 2008 @ 21:29

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:30:45#7
alexkidd

Monk
33765 points


Send PM


22/M/limerick, Ireland
Join Date: Sep 2006

and yeah, when you're older it would certainly be considered child porn, and certainly if you uploaded it to a site.

she wasn't old enough to consent to those pictures.


alexkidd last visited May 12, 2008
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:30:49#8
adrinachrome

Debater
5175 points


Send PM


25/M/Tucson, Arizona
Join Date: Apr 2008

unspokenwords said:
lets says you are a 16 year old boy who has naughty pics of you with your gf or something.. and then down the road you still have them not deleting them but you're now 18, you can get charged for pics you took being 16..?

that is kinda crazy .. but..

kids shouldn't be taking those types of pics anyways but plenty do I'm sure..


No doubt it would be illegal, but would it be wrong? I cant say that morally that would be wrong I mean you saw her when you took the pictures, although if you were like my age and you still had pictures of your naked 15 ear old girlfriend, that would be kinda creepy.


clever got me this far then tricky got me in
adrinachrome last visited <font color=#990033>6 minutes ago </font>
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:31:29#9
skins

Debater
6860 points


Send PM


41/M/medway, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2006

alexkidd said:
child porn is porographic images of children,
so yes.

what age are we talking here?, like 15/16 say, is possessing images of your 15 yr old girlfriend illegal if you're 15?
i guess technically it is, you're not old enough to consent to having that photo taken, no matter who takes it.
it obviously wouldn't be dealt with as severely.

but uploading it is certainly illegal and would be, thats circulating pornographic images of children.












THE WORD!


I eat f**king chickens,
and don't f**k lesbians.
No offence.
skins last visited May 12, 2008
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:32:17#10
adrinachrome

Debater
5175 points


Send PM


25/M/Tucson, Arizona
Join Date: Apr 2008

But if you were 16 when you took the pictures and you still had them when you were 18, how can that be morally wrong? What if you're still with the girl?


clever got me this far then tricky got me in

adrinachrome last visited <font color=#990033>6 minutes ago </font>
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:35:03#11
unspokenwords

Points Whore Master
62893 points


Send PM


22/F/In la la land.,
Join Date: Sep 2005

creepy discussion but yeah.

ok going away from that and more onto the topic

Thing that scares me is that plenty of guys who seem regular you see getting caught on 'to catch a predator' to meet young girls but some of the guys seem clearly disturbed.

What is the attraction there I think it's quite disgusting..


"You fondle my trigger, then you blame my gun"

unspokenwords is online! (Last active within 8 minutes)
0 Kudos   Edited: May 08, 2008 @ 21:36

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:35:54#12
skins

Debater
6860 points


Send PM


41/M/medway, United Kingdom
Join Date: Dec 2006

adrinachrome said:
But if you were 16 when you took the pictures and you still had them when you were 18, how can that be morally wrong? What if you're still with the girl?







It is still just morally wrong, looked at from any viewpoint.


I eat f**king chickens,
and don't f**k lesbians.
No offence.
skins last visited May 12, 2008
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:37:14#13
adrinachrome

Debater
5175 points


Send PM


25/M/Tucson, Arizona
Join Date: Apr 2008

I would have to say youth? What else could it be?


clever got me this far then tricky got me in

adrinachrome last visited <font color=#990033>6 minutes ago </font>
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:37:37#14
unspokenwords

Points Whore Master
62893 points


Send PM


22/F/In la la land.,
Join Date: Sep 2005

it's morally wrong to share them in the first place on the net but they will always have the history on your computer, so.. in the end you might still even get in trouble for something that happened when you were underage?

Kids need to watch what the hell they are doing


"You fondle my trigger, then you blame my gun"

unspokenwords is online! (Last active within 8 minutes)
0 Kudos   

New Post! May 08, 2008 @ 21:37:56#15
adrinachrome

Debater
5175 points


Send PM


25/M/Tucson, Arizona
Join Date: Apr 2008

skins said:
It is still just morally wrong, looked at from any viewpoint.



Well we definitely disagree on that.


clever got me this far then tricky got me in
adrinachrome last visited <font color=#990033>6 minutes ago </font>
0 Kudos   
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: 1 2 3 ...9 10 11 · >>

Top

TFS Time: Tue 13 May 2008 01:27 pm CDT
Copyright © 2004-2008 Funky Llama Productions, LLC   |   Home   |   Contact   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of service
Proudly hosted by Liquid Web

 
The Forum Site - Your premier source for everything