Forum Index > Random > Man Talk
Mar 29, 2008 @ 09:33:56 | #2 | amish
Debater 5037 points


31/M/, Join Date: Feb 2008 | although an opposing viewpoint exists throughout many parts of the world, there isn't a place on earth where we don't teach a woman to be proud of herself for basically being a servant.
and that's in places where the idea has the weakest following, where you can go to the grocery store and find several books (again, in a store not made to sell books) on how a woman can learn to submit more, (first to god, and finally) to her man.
i am okay with the idea, as long as it's mutual, except that it isn't. i mean a couple should be happy to let their guard down around each other, and do everything to make each other happy.
no woman should have a true master, it's no more fit than for a man. i don't have anything against butlers, nannies, and maids, of course. but here in the united states, we certainly continue to teach women to be in our employ, even if they are otherwise "independent." it's enough to make anyone restless even if they do not know why, and men would have the same attitude if they all had the same treatment.
 mary matalin <-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|- 0 -|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-> marlee matlin
 | | 0 Kudos  | Edited: March 29, 2008 @ 09:36 | |
|
Mar 29, 2008 @ 09:42:21 | #4 | amish
Debater 5037 points


31/M/, Join Date: Feb 2008 | Quote: Going back to your post, you'd be surprised at how many men are liable to use the word "relax" to cover up their laziness!
i don't agree with this either. what has been given to women is basically a puritan work ethic, work for the sake of work, a servant mindset is going to make people feel some need to do more than is necessary.
i think men are onto this on some level, some of them see women as working for the sake of it, hence this thread. but that doesn't mean there is merit in it, it's not for men to become "not lazy" but for women to identify with something other than being servants.
the fact that our culture is a sometimes unconscious conspiracy to make women do our bidding doesn't change the fact that many men have striven to help make things more and more balanced over time. i'm not saying that our society doesn't remain patriarchal when it does, i'm saying that where men should be given more credit for helping more, they are actually given less as women come to the realization that society craps on them. you may laugh, but as a people that should identify with justice and liberation, we're very much in this one together.
 mary matalin <-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|- 0 -|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-> marlee matlin
 | | |
Mar 29, 2008 @ 12:00:08 | #8 | amish
Debater 5037 points


31/M/, Join Date: Feb 2008 | in fairness, it's a tough pill to swallow.
i would point out what's at stake here:
for one, we have the issue of justice itself. as long as women are taught to be servants (even if they rightly fight against such an idea) we have a caste system not so much unlike the one in india that we scoff at, feeling so very superior to that kind of thinking, when it is alive and well here.
the karma ( or whatever you call it in your religion, atheists call it "justice" and christians call it "judgement." ) of such an injustice is something we all share, and it has us living in a world that is unfair to everyone.
the other thing is that a master and servant* cannot possibly love each other as fully or beautifully as equals. to dominate is to cheat yourself out of a deeper love. as long as we can do better than that, really we should. (*i meant literally, but if anyone is going to go there, i have an answer for that too.)
 mary matalin <-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|- 0 -|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-> marlee matlin
 | | 0 Kudos  | Edited: March 29, 2008 @ 12:11 | |
|
Top
|