Forum Index > Business & Finance
>> Boycotting Virgin Media?
Reply to Topic
Search Topic
Subscription
Author Message

New Post! May 01, 2008 @ 17:21:40#1
gideon1451

Debater
5162 points


Send PM


15/M/Greater Manchester, United Kin
Join Date: Jul 2007

I've looked up this on Google and still don't understand why people are boycotting Virgin Media?
People say Virgin is trying to end the internet and silly claims like that?

Can anyone enlighten me?


Proud Christian, Vegetarian, Brit.

www.myspace.com/gideon1451

gideon1451 last visited July 07, 2008
0 Kudos   Edited: May 01, 2008 @ 17:22

New Post! May 01, 2008 @ 17:29:09#2
jonnythan

Abominable Snowman
84907 points


Send PM


27/M/NY, New York
Join Date: Aug 2005

The Virgin Media CEO, Neil Berkett, essentially said that net neutrality is crap.

He claims that content providers such as Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Myspace, etc, should have to pay ISPs such as Virgin lots of money in order to carry their traffic.

Net Neutrality is sort of a big deal. It's the idea that ISPs are content neutral. That is, subscribers pay for bandwidth and it shouldn't matter where the content is coming from. The contrary view is that the ISPs should have the "right" to severely degrade service from large sites or corporations unless those sites and corporations pay the ISP.

Clearly, the idea of Net Neutrality is popular among consumers and content providers. The only people who seem to be against it are the ISPs, because they sense the ability to extort tons of money from the likes of Google, Facebook, Myspace, Yahoo, etc, by holding their data hostage.


My Flickr

jonnythan last visited July 09, 2008
0 Kudos   Edited: May 01, 2008 @ 17:29

New Post! May 01, 2008 @ 17:33:24#3
gideon1451

Debater
5162 points


Send PM


15/M/Greater Manchester, United Kin
Join Date: Jul 2007

jonnythan said:
The Virgin Media CEO, Neil Berkett, essentially said that net neutrality is crap.

He claims that content providers such as Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Myspace, etc, should have to pay ISPs such as Virgin lots of money in order to carry their traffic.

Net Neutrality is sort of a big deal. It's the idea that ISPs are content neutral. That is, subscribers pay for bandwidth and it shouldn't matter where the content is coming from. The contrary view is that the ISPs should have the "right" to severely degrade service from large sites or corporations unless those sites and corporations pay the ISP.

Clearly, the idea of Net Neutrality is popular among consumers and content providers. The only people who seem to be against it are the ISPs, because they sense the ability to extort tons of money from the likes of Google, Facebook, Myspace, Yahoo, etc, by holding their data hostage.




Oh, okay, I understand it now, Thanks for the help


Proud Christian, Vegetarian, Brit.

www.myspace.com/gideon1451
gideon1451 last visited July 07, 2008
0 Kudos   
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

Top

TFS Time: Wed 09 Jul 2008 12:18 am CDT
Copyright © 2004-2008 Funky Llama Productions, LLC   |   Home   |   Contact   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of service
Proudly hosted by Liquid Web

 
The Forum Site - Your premier source for everything