@Sandrocksonic Said
This information found in the laptop will destroy the Clinton crime syndicate if it gets out
Luke Rosiak | Daily Caller - September 7, 2017
A laptop that Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has frantically fought to keep prosecutors from examining may have been planted for police to find by her since-indicted staffer, Imran Awan, along with a letter to the U.S. Attorney.
U.S. Capitol Police found the laptop after midnight April 6, 2017, in a tiny room that formerly served as a phone booth in the Rayburn House Office Building, according to a Capitol Police report reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group. Alongside the laptop were a Pakistani ID card, copies of Awan’s driver’s license and congressional ID badge, and letters to the U.S. attorney. Police also found notes in a composition notebook marked “attorney-client privilege.”
The laptop had the username “RepDWS,” even though the Florida Democrat and former Democratic National Committee chairman previously said it was Awan’s computer and that she had never even seen it.
Awan was banned Feb. 2, 2017, from the congressional computer network because he is a suspect in a cybersecurity investigation, but he still had access to House facilities because Wasserman Schultz continued to employ him.
The laptop was found on the second floor of the Rayburn building — a place Awan would have had no reason to go because Wasserman Schultz’s office is in the Longworth building and the other members who employed him had fired him.
Read More Here
I notice that nothing in this infowars article actually SAYS what was on this laptop, only that its state of discovery was suspicious and that the alleged owner is under a cyber security investigation. Kind of premature to declare that it could 'destroy the Clinton's crime syndicate' if even the people writing the article appear to have no idea what's actually on the computer, don't you think?
We have two possible scenarios here that assumes the content of the laptop is damaging. One scenario is that this evidence was planted by those who have an axe to grind with either the representative, anyone else the information targets, or perhaps even Awan himself, in which case it's entire validity is called into question. The other assumes its contents are genuine, in which case the implication of Awan as the leaker makes no logical sense. Why would Awan leak this information if we assume it is genuine? Did he have a sudden burst of conscience after being indicted for bank fraud? That seems unlikely. If the information was part of an underground deal of some sort regarding sentence than maybe, though it's clandestine, roundabout nature make that both illogical and unlikely, especially considering that they effectively made any attempts at secrecy worthless by leaving identification at the scene to begin with.
This smells more like there's a third party involved and with unknown motives at that. I would be very cautious of accepting any piece of evidence at that scene as genuine at face value.