Forum Index > News & Politics > Animal Rights
Jan 28, 2008 @ 02:15:58 | #36 | jeanettesianrachel
Ogler 27320 points


42/F/Medway, United Kingdom Join Date: Dec 2006 | matterdaddy84 said: Please say that you are joking. You don't really want to test a potentially harmful drug on another human being just because of their past deeds, do you?
That seems like insanity to me. They are still human beings no matter what they did. To test expieramental anything on them would make you just as much of a monster as they were.
Nazi Germany tested drugs and other "cutting edge" medical practices on their death row inmates during WW2.
I say long live animal testing. In the big scheme of things, it doesn't really matter what happens to the lab animals, so long as it benefits humanity in the end.
but its fine to test it on animals whos only past deed may be to kill for food,why not humans there waiting to die and some for many years,i often see in newspapers people wanted to test a unlicienced product no difference really put that way,if anything disgustingly inhuman was done on one of your family or friends would you let the person go free after 5 yrs on death row because of the past deeds,if you can honestly say yes then your a better person than me cos i would want them to suffer in pain for the rest of their life.
 With a thrill in her HEAD,
& a pill on her tongue?
she lied enough to be just begone,
saying my "bye byes" all nite long.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN! | | |
Top
|