What if there were no leaks?

@mrmhead Said

Trump, GOPers, and I'm sure some Dems are complaining about the leaks and that the leaks are more significant than the information released.

I DISAGREE (in most cases)

Sure, even without the leaks we'd get an indication of how f***ed up the administration is, but leaks just help us to (hopefully) get to the bottom of things quicker- aka TRANSPARENCY

Yeah, calling Comey a "nut job" is kind of petty, but what about some of the details behind Flynn, or other dirt on Trump. I think, maybe eventually, we'd hear about it - because Trump and his administration appear to be so chaotic - either Trump would tweet it, or alt-Spicer would contradict it.

But I think leaks are an essential part to ensuring transparency to the gov't.

___
On a different tangent - They're complaining about so many leaks compared to other administrations - No Other Administration has been so f***ED UP!!
It is apparent by the the tweets, and the conflicting information (alt-spicer, alt-conway, et al.) spewing out of DC, despite of the leaks.


That's just my opinion, I could be wrong

@chaski Said

Let's all be honest here.

Leaks are good if they involve Obama, Hillary and the Democrats.

However, leaks that involve Trump (even if leaked by himself) are horrid national security threats and someone who is a liberal snowflake should go to jail.

Remember when Trump said he could murder someone on 5th Avenue (or Central Park or wherever it was) and no one would hold it against him?

Well apparently he thinks that the leakers are worse then his actions....Nixon probably had the same opinion.

I have friends that are livid about the leakers, but insist that Trump didn't nothing wrong.

So here is my question: If there was a leak about something that wasn't wrong, how can the leaker be bad?