@MadCornishBiker Said
Jesus was resurrected on the third day,so where's the problem. He not only dod thigns after that resurrection, like meeting with his followers, btu is still doing thigns in heaven after his ascension there.
Church history has been re-written many times, and they still can't get it right. All anyone needs to know about Christianity and the Worship of the One True God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is in the pages of the bible.
I have to admit that I have no idea what the Dead Sea Scrolls said about Paul, but since the non-biblical parts of them (which make up some 60%) have long been discredited I have no interest. I am not interested in the Apcryphal or Pseudepigraphical sections. The bible is complete without them and they simply don't fit anywhere.
If you think that Paul is the beast of Revelation firstly you are way off, and secondly I would have to ask which beast? People are still arguing about their origins.
There are two after all, and neither represents Paul, who was not a false prophet and only fools think he was, sorry but to that is how it is. This whole Paulism thing is ridiculous, there is not one thing that Paul taught that was not taught by Christ or the other Apostles, and if you stopped to think you would have to acknowledge that.
Can you name one thing? No you can't you have tried it before and I
have shown you from scripture just how wrong you are. Even Peter called him "Our beloved Brother" despite having been strongly corrected by him. But then I guess Peter was used to correction, Jesus had to correct him enough times, even saying "get behind me Satan" to him at one point.
As to the two beasts of Revelation. A careful study of them reveals that the first beast is in fact this worlds Satanically ruled Governments, (i. e. all of them), as a comparison with similar prophecies in Daniel shows; whilst the second beats which is also called the Image of the Beast prefigures the League of Nations, followed by it re-incarnation, the United Nations. That too is easily shown by a comparison with events surrounding those two bodies. It is too good a fit for that not to be the case. Revelation was written about these times, not the days of Paul,and was even written after he died, in 95 C.E. on Patmos where John was in exile. As the angel told John
Revelation 1:19 Therefore write down the things you saw, and the things that are and the things that will take place after these.
You only show your ignorance of scripture with the claims you make.