The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Politics

Trump

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: << · 1 2 3 ...332 333 334 335 336 ...614 615 616 · >>
psycoskunk On December 24, 2020
Funky-Footed Skunk





A fort made of stinky socks, C
#4996New Post! Mar 28, 2017 @ 21:40:37
@chaski Said

We...I mean Canada...will be pumping oil...I mean liquid coal...through those pipelines....

Simple logic....

If "A" (Coal) = "B" (fossil fuels}
And B" (fossil fuels} = "C" (Oil)
Then "A" (Coal) = "C" (Oil)

And if 99% of the jobs go to Canada then

If "A" (Canada) = "B" (part of North America}
And B" (part of North America} = "C" (the USA)
Then "A" (Canada) = "C" (the USA)

So, any jobs made are coal jobs in the USA.



Trumple-Down-Economics



Meanwhile the nasty goopy tar oil will have most of the crap removed from it and left to bake in local ports before sending it off to China as a super cheap, extremely high-polluting fuel because y'know, Chinese health regulations.
chaski On April 19, 2024
Stalker





Tree at Floydgirrl's Window,
#4997New Post! Mar 28, 2017 @ 21:43:09
@psycoskunk Said

Meanwhile the nasty goopy tar oil will have most of the crap removed from it and left to bake in local ports before sending it off to China as a super cheap, extremely high-polluting fuel because y'know, Chinese health regulations.


The Chinese are cool with it.

Hey, when you have 1.357+ billion people, who cares if 10% or 20% or 50% die of air pollution related illness.
nooneinparticular On March 16, 2023




, Hawaii
#4998New Post! Mar 29, 2017 @ 01:38:22
@white_swan53 Said

Like anyone who has never been in the military , my knowledge of war and how it works would fit in a thimble with room left over.
Does this mean that our troops are over there basically fighting blind? With no commander in chief studying the big picture / map and guiding / directing the troops on the ground ?


The duties of the president are a bit more big picture than that. He can station troops in certain areas without the approval of Congress. That's about it, in regards to troop movement. Everything else requires a declaration of war from Congress first. Assuming we have that, the President then has the power to order things like invasions or bombings.

He's still, however, not dealing with military minutia. Even if the President orders an invasion, it's up to the chain of command to figure out exactly how they're going to do it. Without directions from the President, the most trouble I'd expect is that the military ends up in a holding pattern of sorts. They don't invade new targets, but they continue working on the objectives they already have until they're done or Congress steps in. At that point, they just basically sit on their hands waiting for the next order.

From everything I've been able to find, if you're worried about troops on the ground having no direction on how to complete objectives because the President isn't watching than don't be. Keeping them safe and able to do their jobs is part of the responsibility of the military chain of command. From what I could gather, the only role the President really has is giving the military an objective to begin with.
nooneinparticular On March 16, 2023




, Hawaii
#4999New Post! Mar 29, 2017 @ 01:47:34
@white_swan53 Said

Is this just so much 'pissin' in the wind' or is it something that is doable , yes an up hill battle, but doable ? Or am I not comprehending what I'm reading ?? What I'm getting from this ,is that a private citizen or citizens can legally bring charges against a member of the government , if that citizen believes a crime has been committed .


“The constitutional power of ‘we the people’ sitting as grand jurors has been subverted by a deceptive play on words since 1946 when the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were enacted. Regardless, the power still exists in the Constitution and has been upheld by the United States Supreme Court.”
Donofrio says the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides the power for a Grand Jury of the people without reliance upon a U.S. Attorney to concur in such criminal charges.

The issue has been discussed often in legal journals. Roger Roots, writing in the “Creighton Law Review,” stated: “In theory, the grand jury is a body of independent citizens that can investigate any crime or government misdeed that comes to its attention. In practice, however, the grand jury is dependent upon the prosecutor to bring cases and gather evidence.

Thus, while the grand jury still exists as an institution — in a sterile, watered-down, and impotent form — its decisions are the mere reflection of the United States Justice Department.

The powers for citizen grand juries have been affirmed by several Supreme Court decisions. Justice Powell, in United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974), stated:
“The grand jury’s historic functions survive to this day. Its responsibilities continue to include both the determination of whether there is probable cause to believe a crime has been committed and the protection of citizens against unfounded criminal prosecutions. Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 686-687 (1972).”

In United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992), Justice Scalia, delivering the opinion of the court, laid down the law of the land:
“'[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history,… the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It “‘is a constitutional fixture in its own right.'”

Robert Campbell, founder of the American Grand Jury, says that this passage sets the stage for a revolutionary new FOURTH BRANCH of the Government in the United States. “Besides, the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches, I submit that there is a fourth branch, THE GRAND JURY, and “we the people” when sitting as grand jurors, are, as Scalia quoted in US v. Williams, “a constitutional fixture in its own right.”

He quotes more of Scalia’s opinion regarding the Grand Jury:
In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people.

“The law is on our side,” Campbell says. “We the People have the right and power under the 5th Amendment of the Constitution to charge this government with crimes whether the US Attorneys or the federal judges agree with us. As the Supreme Court has so brilliantly stated, we are the “buffer between the Government and the people.”

Campbell’s American Grand Jury team is actively pursuing decisions in a number of United States District Courts located in multiple jurisdictions including: the District of Columbia, Tennessee, Alabama, Florida, Kansas, New York, Texas, California, Arizona, Connecticut, and others.
Campbell says that a federal judge, Royce Lamberth, U.S. District Court in Washington, DC, has issued two opinions in response to the filings including the statement that the presentments are constitutionally permitted…”


Yes private citizens or a group of them are allowed to sue the government, or specific people in them. The caveat being that if the alleged crime is both allowable by law and constitutional, then well the lawsuit will find itself up the river without a paddle.
mrmhead On March 27, 2024




NE, Ohio
#5000New Post! Mar 29, 2017 @ 15:59:57
re: Russian links to Trump campaign:
Alt-Spicer asked. "At some point, you do have to ask yourself what are you actually looking for. How many times do you have to come to the same conclusion before you take the answer?"

A: Well, following the example of congressional replubicans on Obamacare .. More than 50
bob_the_fisherman On January 30, 2023
Anatidaephobic





, Angola
#5001New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 00:48:21
@white_swan53 Said

Like anyone who has never been in the military , my knowledge of war and how it works would fit in a thimble with room left over.
Does this mean that our troops are over there basically fighting blind? With no commander in chief studying the big picture / map and guiding / directing the troops on the ground ?


In dealing with a known target it is perhaps desirable to have a situational commander who is authorised to make immediate decisions based on first hand knowledge, rather than being required to go through a series of authorities who have no operational knowledge and are located many thousands of miles away.

Would they be fighting blind? No. At least they shouldn't be. Politicians should make political decisions and where military action is required, those decisions should, as much as possible, be left to the military itself to carry out. There may be times where a political decision is required (for example in a case where a high value target is located in a place with a high risk of civilian casualties, or outside a designated theatre of operation), but otherwise the military should operate as bureaucracy free as possible in order to be effective. This seems reasonable to me. But my knowledge of the military is based only on conversations with military personnel rather than direct involvement.
chaski On April 19, 2024
Stalker





Tree at Floydgirrl's Window,
#5002New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 01:05:53
@bob_the_fisherman Said

In dealing with a known target it is perhaps desirable to have a situational commander who is authorised to make immediate decisions based on first hand knowledge, rather than being required to go through a series of authorities who have no operational knowledge and are located many thousands of miles away.
.



As often is the case, it depends on the circumstances.

Is this the heat of battle?

Are we being overrun?

Is our prime target who is rarely in our sights now available?

Is this a bombing mission that will likely have considerable collateral damage? How much?

Are there greater geo-political ramifications?

There are certain decisions that should always reside with the leader of a country and not his/her generals.

Trump...in spite of his grandiose claims knows nothing of war, nothing of national security, and nothing of our military (and as an aside nothing of politics either).

Because of this, to a point, it is a good idea that he is passing the decision making to someone else.

However, make no mistake about it, all that Trump is really doing is passing the buck. He is doing it so if anything goes wrong he can claim that it wasn't his fault and he was set up.
bob_the_fisherman On January 30, 2023
Anatidaephobic





, Angola
#5003New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 02:09:24
@chaski Said

However, make no mistake about it, all that Trump is really doing is passing the buck. He is doing it so if anything goes wrong he can claim that it wasn't his fault and he was set up.


Yes. Because in our new magical fairy land where unicorns are bountiful and truth is told by mainstream media, Trump always does things for bad reasons because he can never do good.

I am starting to think that many people now salivate when they hear circus music as it reminds them to eat their daily bread.
chaski On April 19, 2024
Stalker





Tree at Floydgirrl's Window,
#5004New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 03:37:23
@bob_the_fisherman Said

Yes. Because in our new magical fairy land where unicorns are bountiful and truth is told by mainstream media, Trump always does things for bad reasons because he can never do good.

I am starting to think that many people now salivate when they hear circus music as it reminds them to eat their daily bread.



Oh I didn't know that we had shifted to your opinion of Obama and Hillary.
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#5005New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 03:48:07
@chaski Said

Oh I didn't know that we had shifted to your opinion of Obama and Hillary.


Oh snap!
nooneinparticular On March 16, 2023




, Hawaii
#5006New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 09:40:28
@bob_the_fisherman Said

Yes. Because in our new magical fairy land where unicorns are bountiful and truth is told by mainstream media, Trump always does things for bad reasons because he can never do good.

I am starting to think that many people now salivate when they hear circus music as it reminds them to eat their daily bread.


Trump doesn't seem to want to take any responsibilities for his failures. He failed to get a Republican Healthcare plan passed in a Republican Congress, but no, it's the Democrats fault for not supporting the bill even though the Democrats didn't need to give him s*** and it still would have gotten through with just Republican votes. He and Ryan couldn't get the votes together, but instead of just admitting that and moving on, instead he blames the Democrats and the Freedom Caucus.
mrmhead On March 27, 2024




NE, Ohio
#5007New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 11:56:04
@nooneinparticular Said

Trump doesn't seem to want to take any responsibilities for his failures. He failed to get a Republican Healthcare plan passed in a Republican Congress, but no, it's the Democrats fault for not supporting the bill even though the Democrats didn't need to give him s*** and it still would have gotten through with just Republican votes. He and Ryan couldn't get the votes together, but instead of just admitting that and moving on, instead he blames the Democrats and the Freedom Caucus.


And it was Obama that approved the plan for the raid in Yemen where many civilians and one SEAL died.

But Trump gave the green light on the successful raid that retrieved "Important Information"
mrmhead On March 27, 2024




NE, Ohio
#5008New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 15:27:12
"The Freedom Caucus will hurt the entire Republican agenda if they don't get on the team, & fast. We must fight them, & Dems, in 2018!" Trump tweeted.


But he's willing to be friends and work with Putin / Russia
chaski On April 19, 2024
Stalker





Tree at Floydgirrl's Window,
#5009New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 15:33:45
@nooneinparticular Said

Trump doesn't seem to want to take any responsibilities for his failures.



chaski On April 19, 2024
Stalker





Tree at Floydgirrl's Window,
#5010New Post! Mar 30, 2017 @ 16:09:09
Quote:

Paul Ryan: "Russia is clearly tried to meddle in our political system..."

Wait! What?



PS
He goes on to say that Trump won the election fair and square, which is true, but this Russia meddling stuff is Liberal Snowflake Cool-Aid.
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: << · 1 2 3 ...332 333 334 335 336 ...614 615 616 · >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   News & Current Events
Fri May 27, 2016 @ 08:45
44 978
New posts   Q & A
Thu Oct 10, 2013 @ 01:17
37 1933
New posts   Sports
Sun Nov 18, 2012 @ 21:02
6 358
New posts   Politics
Fri Apr 16, 2010 @ 05:30
28 2306
New posts   Architecture
Wed Oct 28, 2009 @ 08:56
12 9929