Hey, I have this clever idea, everyone!

Actually, I'd probably feel worse if I saw it, because it's a huge embarrassment for women (especially those who like to create new ideas), and I just want to avoid the film at all costs.

Here's an idea: why don't you watch Inside Out? That should make you happy.



Fanart by torakun14 on DeviantArt

" inside out " is a good example of an excellent movie. it can be play or a voice of man or woman.

I don't see anything in the movie that a little girl or a woman doing the voice of the little girl of the movie.

this movie is a big new idea shows boys and girls how the human body reacts to emotions.

there is no huge embarrassment to women, two men wrote the movie, and a women and two men wrote the screenplay.

the movie is design for all ages including men and women.

" Charlie's angels " - the tv show was designed for men. the show three hotties that actually can act, not like " Baywatch " that was stupid show.

Charlie's angels movies were stupid and created by two men. I thought the two movies's storylines were bad, it would have work if men play the starring roles.

you have a problems with " double standards " movies, it would make any different if what gender stars in the movie. either the movie is good or bad.

I will not watch " the new ghostbusters " because one : the storyline look really stupid, second: the movie doesn't remake, and third - the cast is probably better the storyline. it really doesn't matter is there are women in the movie. the movie look stupid to watch.

the writer and the director or even producers of the movie studio of any movie are the one are " double standard " of the cast. these are people, you need gender issues to.

Mulan... essentially done... Disney goes back and forth with stories that are essentially the same theme, only modified for gender and ethnic and cultural application. In fact, humans history is full of these "hero" stories that are essentially the same and have been for thousands of years... The Hero with a Thousand Faces

Charlie's Angels.... done. Riptide and Toni's Boys though this second one didn't take.

Inside Out.... again... essentially the same story line but with boy.

The Karate Kid... done with white male, black male and white girl

Annie...white female, black female...essentially the same story as Oliver Twist white male...

This is what happens. A story comes out; TV, Movies, Book, etc. It is successful. Other people copy it in as many ways as possible.

Why?

No. It isn't gender or racial discrimination. It is the desire to make money.

You continue to invent poorly thought out arguments and you don't know to support...because they are poorly thought out.

Literally every one (as in all) of your posts.

Your posts literally look like they were written by two or three personalities that are battling for control of you little mind.

There are no "new" ideas when it comes to movies and TV...they are all essentially remakes of previously done shows/story lines with only slight modifications.

In fact, there really isn't anything new in the story telling aspects of entertainment...same themes that have been around for all of human life.

...girl or boy meets boy or girl, loses girl or boy, tries to win boy or girl back, success or tragic failure.

or

...the down trodden rise up against the oppressor, success or tragic failure

or

...a mix of the above

or

...historical events.


That about covers it with only modifications in gender, age, race, location, culture, ethnicity.

So what.

America steals European independent movies, because british humor is more better than American humor.

for an example:

the british and original version of " death at a funeral " ( 2007 ) is more funny than American black version in 2010.

uk comedy independent movies are not design for big audience, they aim for small audience that can become a cult classic.

the " monty phyron flying circus " movies were phenomena, because the times when they came out.

black version of " death of the funeral " was miscast and toomany big stars were in hit. not really funny. the time was off, when it came out.

So how come you care?

Anita Sarkeesian is a moron of incredibly high calibre, but, as Chaski says, why care about her? Yes, there is no doubt that she peddles all the tired lies about how the west is some evil misogynist patriarchy, but who cares? No one with an age and IQ over 30 truly believes this drivel. Let her have her fun blaming men for her oppression while she rakes in the dough from the gullible. Who cares?