@Erimitus Said
Easter philosophy rejects the ego mind and transcends will and desire.
Western Philosophy (for the most part) is an attempt to control and organize the reasoning mind; to direct desire along the proper channels.
I do not believe that East and West are mutually exclusive.
I'm not that well versed in easter philosophy (
) but as I understand eastern philosophy (at least as it expresses itself via Buddhism - especially zen - it does not so much
reject the ego mind as seek to
see it for what it is. Again, not so much seeking to
transcend will and desire as to
redirect them.
I've just searched for a post I made in response to our pal the Electric Banana, and found it........
I was just dipping into the words of the world famous Pai-chang, who told us that what is called desire and aversion when one is not yet enlightened or liberated are called enlightened wisdom after enlightenment. That is why it is said, "One is not different from who one used to be; only one's course of action is different from before."
Thus we remain the very same d***.
It remains to be said that zen is still not my home ground as such, but Pure Land Buddhism. There, it is stated that we gain enlightenment WITHOUT transcending the passions. It is the way of the foolish bonbu who can do absolutely nothing of themselves to gain enlightenment.
But getting back to zen, the proverb I have often quoted......"A clearly enlightened person falls into the well. How is this so?"
So, as far as I am able to understand, coming in from the "east", no, not mutually exclusive.